How to define the strength of the cryptocurrency circle? I think there are several aspects: Funds: having a lot of money is the strongest in the greatest sense Experience: the foundation of the cryptocurrency circle, mainly refers to having clear values, knowing the rules, being independent, and getting out of the giant baby state. Hard technology is secondary. Consensus: There is a basic consensus on the fact that the cryptocurrency circle can make money, and there is no need to confirm it repeatedly Influence: Can you leverage the leverage of personal connections and then leverage a large number of resources, such as KOL and sickle Professionalism: Specifically refers to some service or functional skills, such as programming, planning, operation, etc.
How strong the strong are, it is clear at a glance, and correspondingly, where are the weak weak?
Poor, ignorant, rushing around, wavering, and having no skills. Of course, the weak are not necessarily incompetent everywhere. For example, some people start low and are indeed very poor, but they work very hard, just lack an opportunity and have bad luck. Do you say he is weak? Still weak, some people are very capable, but have great prejudice against the cryptocurrency circle. Do you say he is weak? Still weak
This also gave rise to another concept
Cherish the weak
In common sense, it is human instinct to dislike the poor and love the rich. Who would prefer the weak?
People in society are diverse. Some people pursue social fairness and justice, some have had painful experiences and desire resonance, some use the weak as a tool to increase influence, some purely enjoy the process of growth, and some are obsessed with preaching values
Diversity constitutes a wonderful world, and the currency circle is no exception, but...
Whether you admire the strong or cherish the weak, the difference is, what level are you at? Have you objectively recognized your identity status?