Regarding order-taking, the old leeks have to say a few words:
Recently, I always see new leeks being attracted to follow orders by some so-called experts who show off their high returns, but most of them end up losing money! Here, the old leeks really feel sorry and sympathize with the new leeks. You can see clearly how the order-taking person can ensure that he makes 100% money. Of course, I mean the order-taking person, not his order. Here is an example:
The order-taking person buys 10,000U to go long, and the personal position of 1,000U is shorted at the same time (the profit sharing ratio is 10%. If the profit sharing ratio is 20%, then 2,000U is shorted). The actual order-taking position requires the person to hold a position, but the shorting amount can be calculated well, and the position of the person who takes the order is balanced between long and short. If the order-taking position is shorted, the same is true for the long position.
Now let's look at the results: if it rises (falls), all the losses of the personal position are compensated from the order-taking profit, even if the position is liquidated, there is no need to worry; if it falls (rises), the loss of the order-taking position has nothing to do with him, and the personal position makes money. In this way, no matter whether the price goes up or down, the funding rate will be charged.
In summary, is it 100% profitable to lead a single person? So those who want to follow orders, don’t you wake up?