Bitcoin returns to $69,000, RGB++ concept coins are going crazy! Is SEAL the next ORDI?

Bitcoin prices have risen this year. As Bitcoin returns to $69,000 today, Bitcoin started poorly in April, falling all the way from $71,000 in early April, and fell to a low of $64,494 on the 3rd. However, it has rebounded in recent days and the market has begun to pick up. The next step is the halving market. CKB, the big cake ecosystem, has also begun to exert its strength. RGB++ is hot. Unicorn Box: 19k ckb-> 148k ckb (7.8 times) $Seal: $0.9 -> $2.3 (2.5 times) $CKB: $0.012 -> $0.023 (1.9 times)

Now everyone starts to fomo the next "second rgb++ asset". It is a good thing that more developers join the ecosystem, but rgb++ and ckb are open and do not require permission. Any developer can join. Please do research and judgment. Due to the unique characteristics of rgb++, what you want to play is not rgb++ for the time being, but ckb assets. At present, because the protocol is still being further improved (see the figure below), 🐍qun秆崴:rgbn996 cannot leap from the second layer back to the first layer.

So, in essence, the second-layer new issuance you are about to participate in is all ckb assets, not rgb++. In the future, can it be turned into rgb++ assets? Yes, any existing ckb assets will be rgb++ assets when they use leap to return to the bitcoin first layer in the future.

So, which one is the "second rgb++"?

To ask this question, you need to understand one thing, rgb++ is a first-layer asset, except for the first official deployment of seal. The first layer has not yet opened the SDK, so you have to wait for a while on the first layer. After opening, you can start playing the "second rgb++" asset on the first layer. In theory, after the official opening of the second layer to leap back to the first layer, any ckb asset can be turned into rgb++, then it depends on which asset is the fastest, from the time dimension. Therefore, the "second rgb++" asset that is currently being discussed is neither the "second" on the first layer nor the "second" on the second layer.