Which one is stronger, ORDI or SATS?

Many people think that Ordi is number one and therefore has the greatest value. There is path dependence here, that is, BTC is the first, so BTC is the most powerful.

But this logic is not a strong correlation, just like the arguments in mathematics, which are not rigorous and sufficient.

The leader we are talking about actually ultimately refers to who has the most space and the highest market value. Of course, this is a little hard to accept, but I like to talk about something practical.

From the perspective of retail investors, the appeal of more than 0 will indeed be greater. If a retail investor only has 1000u, should he buy 4 ordi or a bunch of satsa?

A large quantity will also have an advantage, the trading volume will be greater and the frequency of transactions will be greater, and the larger the trading volume, the more beneficial it will be to the price. Of course, this only represents the views of some people. It does not matter whether it is right or wrong. History has also been made. Next, we are just observing, in the field of inscriptions: Is the ordi of first IS first stronger, or is it the one with large transaction volume, many addresses, Are sats with smaller transaction amounts stronger?

The debate over who is the leader between Ordi and Sats actually doesn’t make much sense, just let the market go and it needs more people’s attention. #ORDI #1000sats