Continuous triggering of stop losses; knowing that it relies on the profit-loss ratio, will you still insist on trading?

If we say that the real situation of continuous triggering of stop losses is to exit with losses (some friends habitually refer to the trailing exit method as trailing stop loss +, but in reality, when the trailing stop loss exceeds the cost, the actual result is taking profit, so I will clarify this), the most likely problem is that the timing of the entry method is not accurate, meaning that technical skills are lacking. Often, as soon as you enter the market, the price starts to fluctuate or pull back, triggering the stop loss. This is unrelated to relying on the profit-loss ratio; with good entry timing, even if the market does not expand, you can still exit at breakeven, just with a bit of hassle. Utilizing breakeven exits can effectively ensure that the win rate does not frequently allow stop losses to erode your capital. You should know that under the premise of being able to grasp entry timing, a good market often does not return to the cost price. Therefore, if the price rushes forward shortly after your entry and then comes back, do not stubbornly wait for the stop loss to exit. Accurately grasping the entry timing is the premise for setting small stop losses and making breakeven exits. If you reverse the order of importance and follow the system, you may end up frequently triggering stop losses until you are out of the game. As for solutions, increase the stop loss range and reduce the position size, allowing the stop loss range to match your current entry ability. Place the stop loss in a position that is not easily reached, and the frequency of stop losses will decrease. As long as your system itself has a positive expectation, you can gradually make money by following the trading plan.