Recently, the blockchain community exploded! The newly launched trading artifact by dappOS—IntentEX, with transaction fees as low as 0.1%, institutional-level liquidity, and speed nearly comparable to centralized exchanges (CEX), has sparked a new round of heated discussions about the future of on-chain trading. Some say this can break the monopoly of CEX, while others say it is just another form of DEX. Today, let's see what exactly gives IntentEX the power to stir the entire market!
The three 'killer features' of IntentEX
1. Market-wide liquidity, trading prices 'rolled' to the extreme
What is the old problem of on-chain exchanges? Liquidity is too poor, and with just a slightly larger order, the price skyrockets. IntentEX distributes user order tasks (Intent Task) to multiple nodes through the dappOS service node network, directly capturing institutional-level liquidity.
Translated, it means: No matter how large your order, you can quickly find the optimal price for execution.
2. Lightning-fast trades, faster than block generation?
How fast is IntentEX's transaction confirmation speed? dappOS, through its exclusive OMS mechanism (Order Management System), allows transaction confirmation speeds to exceed the block generation speed of the blockchain itself. This sounds like cheating, but the logic behind it is quite simple: IntentEX's nodes complete task confirmation before the transaction is fully on-chain, giving users an experience close to instant execution.
3. Transaction fees low enough to make you question life
CEX's transaction fees generally range between 0.2%-0.3%, while IntentEX directly cuts fees down to 0.1%. Why so low? Because it relies on the opBNB chain, a low-fee and efficient settlement layer that reduces the costs of on-chain resource usage. At the same time, the decentralized operation also eliminates the cumbersome operating costs of CEX.
What does IntentEX mean for the market?
1. CEX's 'core advantages' are being replicated
What is the biggest selling point of CEX? Speed, liquidity, and user experience. IntentEX just happens to bring these advantages on-chain in a decentralized way, while also addressing the 'fatal problems' of CEX: opacity and asset storage risks. In IntentEX, the entire transaction is recorded on-chain, safe and transparent.
2. The pain points of DEX have been penetrated
Traditional DEX has two major flaws: liquidity and speed. IntentEX directly addresses these two issues using a service node network and the efficient settlement of opBNB. It can be said that it has elevated DEX to a higher level, with some even starting to call it 'DEX 2.0'.
Controversy: Can IntentEX take down CEX?
This is where the most intense discussions are. Some say that CEX has established deep user habits and trust barriers, making it almost impossible for decentralized exchanges to disrupt; but others believe that the efficiency and cost advantages brought by IntentEX will gradually erode CEX's market share.
• Support for IntentEX's viewpoint:
"Decentralization is the future; IntentEX solves the core problems of DEX with technology, and the days of CEX are numbered."
• Support for CEX's viewpoint:
"No matter how strong the liquidity, the user experience of on-chain transactions still cannot fully compare to CEX; IntentEX can only be a supplement, not a replacement."
• Neutral Party:
"IntentEX is indeed an innovation, but CEX has financial attributes, while DEX has technical attributes; the two may coexist in the long term."
300,000 USD airdrop: The starting point of the Web3 new era?
Did you think IntentEX is just a technological innovation? **Wrong, it is also the clarion call of dappOS declaring war on the market.** This time, they have directly put out 300,000 USD for an airdrop, which is not only to attract users but also to create an intention trading ecosystem of their own. What's more noteworthy is that the opBNB chain behind IntentEX will also gain more attention due to this deep integration.
So the question arises: Would you give up CEX for IntentEX?
Conclusion: Is the future of trading centralized or decentralized?
From the user's perspective, the trading experience is always the top priority. The emergence of IntentEX has taken a revolutionary step for decentralized exchanges, but whether it can fully replace CEX in the future still needs time and market validation.
See you in the comments! Share your thoughts: Are you a fan of CEX, or a future supporter of IntentEX? In this battle of 'Centralization vs Decentralization', which side are you on?