Well said

If a certain country's bank staff

causes a significant loss of 15 trillion state-owned assets
who should bear the responsibility?

In December 2024, the electronic pen costs $100,000, with a total market value of approximately $2 trillion, nearly 15 trillion RMB.

In October 2017, the electronic pen cost $6,500, with a total market value of approximately $300 billion to $500 billion.

Yet, in October 2017, Yao Qian, the director of the Digital Currency Research Institute of the People's Bank of China, gave a speech stating that the value of Bitcoin mainly comes from speculative factors, lacking value anchoring. This is a significant judgment error by Yao Qian! It has caused unprecedented massive explosive losses for the nation and the people in the history of New China!!

If, Yao Qian had made the correct decision in 2017, investing 100 billion RMB to purchase electronic pens, then the country would have earned 15 times pure profit, which is 150 billion RMB, enough to permanently cover all treatment costs for leukemia in minors in China.

May I ask, the country has nurtured so many financial experts and bankers, why is there not a single person who could have earned this wave of electronic pen dividends for the country?

May I ask, do these financiers and bankers count as causing a significant loss of state-owned assets? Should they bear corresponding responsibilities?

How many similar pests like Yao Qian are still hidden deep within the national financial system, continuously causing insane losses for the country?? Children with leukemia who could have been saved are instead lost due to these corrupt officials and pests; is this not a tragedy?