A few days ago, I posted two updates about COS, which was to complete the square task. Brothers need to think for themselves when investing.

Is the COS platform good?

Compared to most projects in the crypto space, it is indeed quite good. At least it has an independent video website, and the website's functions are well developed. However, if you compare it with WEB2 video websites, there is still a significant gap. But I think having a gap is a good thing, indicating a lot of potential. $COS

Currently, I believe the most important point that COS needs to tackle is content. Media platforms and quality content are inseparable. So how can we acquire a large amount of quality content? There is only one way, and that is to spend money. Toutiao (ByteDance) started this way, initially spending money to encourage content aggregation, and after the content increased, they encouraged original content. I have a clear understanding of this approach.

So the question arises, does COS have that much money to spend? Its current market value is only a few hundred million. Back during the self-media war, platforms were subsidizing authors with billions or tens of billions of dollars. $COS

Of course, in the crypto space, one doesn't necessarily need to look at the fundamentals. If the COS project party insists on pumping the price, they can do it dramatically, after all, meme coins can have market values in the tens or hundreds of billions. Driving more people to join the video production process through price pumping might also be a shortcut. #COS开启SocialFi新时代