After Bitcoin rises to one hundred thousand dollars, it will no longer be something ordinary people can play with. To put it grandly, it may become a game between nations. If it rises to this height, we must consider three questions.

1. Does Bitcoin's market value really have to exceed that of gold? The history of gold goes without saying; it has always been hard currency from ancient times to the present. For Bitcoin, which has only been around for twenty years, to challenge gold is indeed astonishing.

2. What does the United States really want to do with Bitcoin? According to Trump's business-like character, Bitcoin may be used by him to solve America's debt problem. In this regard, Bitcoin's market value is still not enough and needs to continue to expand. However, a problem arises: how to take action? Or how to exploit other countries? Will other countries really foolishly take over Bitcoins worth over one hundred thousand or several hundred thousand dollars? I think not, because blockchain can be replicated and lacks technical content. If the U.S. engages in Bitcoin, other countries can also create their own Middle Eastern coin, oil coin, SCO coin, etc. If they don't accept it, what then? It can only empower Bitcoin, for example in the future... (purely speculative) owning one Bitcoin could grant you a green card, etc.

3. Can Bitcoin promote the progress of human civilization? We often say that the crypto world only transports prices and does not create value. The current mainstream in the crypto world is also memes, which do not generate value. So, can blockchain led by Bitcoin promote the progress of human civilization? Can its trust mechanism create some real practical value?