Professor Crypto, a cryptocurrency influencer (KOL), has always been sought after by fans for his unique insights and rich content. But recently, this "award-winning" influencer has been caught in a whirlpool of public opinion because of allegations that he used robots to brush data.
On-chain detective ZachXBT stood up and pointed out that Professor Crypto used thousands of robots to "deceive people into thinking he was influential." This behavior is not only disgraceful, but may also violate the regulations of the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which prohibit the buying and selling of fake social media influence.
Professor Crypto has remained silent in the face of these allegations and has quietly deleted several posts from his social media accounts that showed him accepting the “Best Content Creator” award at the DeGen Summit in Singapore on September 17.
The event is a side event of TOKEN2049, which aims to recognize "key opinion leaders" (KOLs), those who have influential opinions in the crypto industry.
Members of the crypto community are talking about this. Some sharp commentators and NFT artists have begun to question Professor Crypto's true influence, and some even suspect that his fans are robots. This controversy has made people re-examine the so-called "influence" on social media.
It is reported that the incident was exposed shortly after the FTC announced a ban on marketers using fake reviews or other misleading practices to promote products and services.
FTC Chairman Lina Khan emphasized that false reviews not only waste people's time and money, but also distort the market. The new regulations also prohibit companies from increasing the number of fans by paying to use robots.
We’ll continue to watch this story unfold to see if the “crypto professor” can clear himself of suspicion, or if this marks the dawn of an era of stricter social media regulation!
This incident is a reminder that in the digital world, superficial influence may not be as real as it seems. For creators and businesses that rely on real interactions and trust to build their brands, this is a warning and an opportunity to rebuild a more transparent and authentic social media environment.
In conclusion, in the case of Professor Crypto, we see that social media influence can be a carefully orchestrated fake. This is not only a question about individual influencers, but also a question about trust and transparency in the entire cryptocurrency community.
💬 Finally, have you ever doubted the influence of certain KOLs? What do you think of the FTC's crackdown on fake reviews and misleading practices?