Odaily Planet Daily News After the Catizen airdrop distribution information was announced, some players were dissatisfied with the uncommunicated token distribution model and changes in the distribution standards. The developer Pluto Studio admitted that they did not disclose the changes in the standards in advance. After the CATI airdrop interface was opened, several players expressed their disappointment on X because they received a lower share of the rewards than expected. In addition, the Catizen team previously stated that the player's vKitty income rate in the game will be the main determinant of the airdrop distribution. But early last Sunday, after revealing the airdrop distribution to players, Pluto said that it had actually changed the design of the airdrop after discovering that some players used means to artificially increase their income. It said: "During a review of the data from this CATI airdrop, we found that many robot accounts took advantage of this public rule to try to obtain large amounts of CATI tokens by using scripts to increase their vKitty profitability. In this case, following the original airdrop criteria would have severely harmed the interests of real players and community supporters. Therefore, the airdrop criteria were adjusted to minimize the profitability of vKitty and instead focus on 'factors that more accurately reflect real player activity, such as: on-chain interactions, task completion, fish coin purchases and consumption.'" Decrypt reached out to Pluto Studio for comment, including why it did not ban cheating players but changed the criteria for all users, but did not immediately receive a response.