Commenting on the situation with Catizen:
Despite the fact that this project is in Tier 1, I have not been running it in the channel from the very beginning. Since getting into the first echelon of the rating does not mean that people are getting a good AirDrop.
The project had a goal to gather a solvent audience, and they have now rolled out a huge post about their tokenomics and distribution, where they generously scattered all the snot and left little for themselves. - "But what difference does it make if from the very beginning they earned on direct investments in their apps." Now they are convincing everyone of a "long-term" project, but obviously this is not at all what users who played cats and invested their money in them want to hear.
Here only bravo 👏 top business model. I especially liked "5% Liquidity and 10% for Investors" - how is that?! 😂
Catizen - well done, they gathered in their project many times less people than Hamster, but earned before listing more than many Tier1 projects combined.
The conclusion is simple, I did not run this project in the channel, because I am sure that you can manage the funds more wisely, invest 300-500$ not in cats, but for example in Kaspa🚀 and this will be much closer to real Crypto, without shaking about the results of AirDrop.