Wu Shuo learned that Vitalik said in a tweet that I think the concept of an "anonymous society" or even a "financialized pseudo-anonymous society" is unworkable. Collaboration problems cannot be solved. There seems to be a need for a more multi-dimensional concept of identity (hence the "soul-bound" character); without this, the most stable governance structures will only be de facto centralized structures, and other structures will be subject to financialized governance attacks And collapse. It can be said that we have seen the manifestation of these problems in DAO today. Anonymity is a check-and-balance mechanism that exists to deal with the “dark side of the cycle,” but it cannot by itself run the entire cycle. It's like you can't run a society on perpetual rebellious energy. Regarding x-risk, I think the idea of ​​plurality can actually help us more effectively identify risk mitigation measures that people can support.