#区块链快送# The U.S. House of Representatives may vote this week to overturn Biden's veto of SAB 121, which requires a two-thirds majority vote. SAB 121 is an important reason why there are a limited number of digital asset custody service institutions. VanEck pointed out in its spot ETH S-1 filing that Coinbase, as the custodian of all spot ETF products (and most BTC products), is at risk. If SAB 121 results in banks and other institutionally capable providers being prevented from providing custody services, does this mean that Biden and the members of Congress who voted to keep the bill directly contributed to this market risk? This is a question worthy of our deep thought, and you are welcome to leave your thoughts in the comments section. 🤔