1. Since I am playing a blockchain game instead of a Web2 game, the game assets (nft and token) I bought belong to me; unlike Web2 games, the publisher’s backend bans my account or the game rolls back, and the weapons and equipment I bought disappear from my account. Except for me, the blockchain game project, government agencies, and even the king and the queen cannot dispose of the blockchain game assets in my wallet; in the future, the assets I put in the game should be safe enough and cannot be touched by others.


2. If I don’t want to play a blockchain game anymore, I can sell my game assets at any time as long as the game is still in operation. Unlike playing Web2 games, most of the weapons and equipment in Web2 games cannot be traded. If you want to clear them out, you can only sell your account on Xianyu, 5173, or Trading Cat. It is not easy to sell and you are easy to be cheated. After all, only a few web2 game publishers recognize the game asset trading market and allow players to trade directly with each other.


3. I buy assets in blockchain games. If I sell them after the price goes up, I will make a profit. If I can only sell them at a discount, I will lose money. If the game project team is rugged, it will be a loss. Playing blockchain games is not to spend money to buy game experience, but to invest, hoping to make a profit by buying assets and then buying them low and selling them high, or putting assets into the game to make gold.


4. If you play games for entertainment experience rather than investing money to buy game assets and make money with game project parties, then it is best to play Web2 games and stay away from chain games.


5. If a blockchain game is fun to play, then even if the price of the small amount of assets you bought drops later and you lose money on your investment, the impact is actually not that big. Just think of it as spending money on a Web2 game, and the investment becomes consumption, without the expectation of making money back. However, if you continue to work hard and still lose money, and there is no possibility of making money back, then you will definitely not reinvest and will not continue to buy more assets in this game.


6. Since playing blockchain games is an investment, you need to examine the founding team of the blockchain game project, the quality of the game products, and the design of the tokenomics economic system; read the white paper to see how to make money after investing money to buy assets.


7. Investigate the blockchain game project team. Do not touch the purely anonymous team without institutional endorsement. If a popular game team is anonymous and has no institutional endorsement, just buy a small amount and treat it as buying memes to try your luck. Do not touch the team that does not comply with the regulations when issuing coins for blockchain game business. If the blockchain game project is not compliant according to the requirements of the country where the project team is located, it is very likely that the entire team will be arrested at the same time, and the blockchain game project will be directly arrested.


8. In case I don’t understand the game team and the tokenomics economic system, if a reliable friend has bought the game assets, I will follow suit, but I will only buy a small amount to avoid missing out.


9. If the game product itself is well made (good art, playable gameplay design, few bugs, stable game server and client systems, which can immerse new players and allow them to play for several days), this shows that the project party has invested heavily in the game (time + money), has strong technical capabilities, and is not likely to rugby at the first asset release. This kind of blockchain game project can buy more game assets.


10. It is best if the founding team with status in the industry shows up in public and talks directly with the players. This is because being able to show up in public shows compliance. At the same time, people with status in the industry are more concerned about their reputation and are less likely to rugby as soon as assets are released. Only workers are sent to show up and talk to players. If something goes wrong, the workers will take the blame and leave. Be cautious when buying assets from blockchain game projects where only workers appear as agents.


11. If the game product itself is beautiful and stable, but the economic system design is unclear, there is no rich web2+web3 operation plan, and there is no strategy to introduce more new players to invest and consume in the game, it is likely that the investment of early players will not be recovered. If early players curse in the community all day long and new players are discouraged, this game will definitely fail. Even if the project looks good, we can only buy a small amount and wait and see.


12. If the blockchain game project tells me that I will definitely make money by buying assets, then there must be something wrong with the design of the game’s economic system and it will collapse soon.


13. If the production level and technical stability of a blockchain game project are very poor compared to similar games, and it looks shoddy at first glance, or the operation feels very uncomfortable in the first minute, it means that the project team is incompetent, does not take it seriously, and invests very little in the project, which may ruggedize at any time. In this case, such a blockchain game should be directly passed.


14. If you can make gold for free in a blockchain game without investing any assets, then this game will definitely be mined and sold by scientists in countries and regions with cheap labor, causing the economic system to collapse quickly. This kind of blockchain game should be directly passed.


15. If the way to make money in a blockchain game is to PK with other players, and you get rewards (chips) if you win and lose them if you lose, this is a fair and healthy way to play. If you lose in PK, you can just admit it (it may be that your gaming skills are really not good, you didn't think carefully and made mistakes, wrong strategies, etc.). PK with other players can be PVP or ranking.


16. The reward mechanism and chip distribution of PVP or leaderboards must be open and transparent, and preferably verified by smart contracts on the blockchain, and should not be controlled by the project team. If the project team controls everything and has the final say, and changes the game rules without consulting anyone, then even if this blockchain game is well done, it should be abandoned.


17. Vote with your feet. As soon as the situation is not going well, you will immediately sell off your game assets. You will have to sell at a loss to get back as much as you can.


18. Players spend money to buy blockchain game assets, which theoretically means they are small shareholders of the game project. If the player community established by the project has a DAO autonomous mechanism, each stakeholder can use their own assets as chips to vote and jointly participate in the decision-making of game play design and PK chip allocation, it would be perfect.


Finally, decentralization is an ideal of an autonomous world worth exploring, and playing games in an autonomous world is very worth looking forward to. There is still a long way to go for decentralized game development, distribution, and operation, which requires continuous trial and error. It has not been realized yet, but maybe one game will succeed after trying.