For a good speaker or blogger, the answer lies in the problem itself; it is reasonable to assume that a similar rule applies in economics. The silent one is probably in silence, and despite all the frivolity, is this a joke?
Precision is a wonderful property, but in the current economy it is applied to the industry, it would probably be better to say locally, locally.
For example, if we take mechanical engineering, then with degrees of precision above the required limits, there will most likely be a huge number of failures under enormous work loads and due to other possible factors due to the specifics of the work. And in principle, in mechanical engineering it is impossible to talk about continuously scalable systems. In mechanical engineering there are standard sizes and model ranges. Here, in passing, one might wonder why dinosaurs became extinct.
Mechanical engineering is a wonderful technology at the space level. Mechanical engineering is and remains a wonderful platform for introducing the latest technologies and investing. But the boom in the development of mechanical engineering occurred in the previous generation, and this progress was not driven by a desire for precision. I would not rely on precision, but would leave a field of freedom that assumes the presence of a number of points with a certain degree of precision, with the ability to play according to the situation.
If we move on to the information model, we gain the ability to deploy due to a number of standard blocks with a field of freedom in which points with a certain degree of precision are embedded. But reality in the smallest details is still very far from calculated models and theories.
Photo: BIXEL
