$ENA and $USUAL , both are involved in RWA stablecoins, but upon comparison, the differences are quite significant!

In simple terms, ENA has created a fund management team that guarantees profits. They invest money into arbitrage strategies that are guaranteed not to lose, providing real profits for USDE holders.

They earn management fees from these funds and charge some fees when minting and redeeming USDE, similar to the buying and selling fees of the fund.

This steady income might be shared with token holders in the future.

The prospect of such dividends, along with their sustainable profit strategies and high income, gives ENA its valuable backing.

In contrast, USUAL lacks stable income sources; initially, the price was high, many staked, and people were willing to exchange US Treasury yields for more valuable tokens, then sell them to new investors.

However, if no new retail investors or fresh capital come in, this token could collapse, continuously declining until it becomes worthless.

To put it simply, ENA focuses on long-term, stable profits, while USUAL resembles a bubble that relies on continuous new capital to sustain itself, posing a greater risk.

$SUI

#ENA #usual #2025加密趋势预测

$USUAL has never lost so much while playing with fakes, added to the position twice, feels like it will explode on me, checked at noon and saw no movement, directly cut my losses.

$USUAL After investing for so many years, the general upward trend is low-volume increase, high-volume increase, low-volume decrease, then low-volume increase, high-volume increase. Now the trading volume has consistently maintained at 300 million. If it really goes to $1.6, I estimate the trading volume will need to reach 600-1,000 million, which is quite unlikely... It would be better to have a low-volume decrease, drop to several tens of millions, then low-volume increase, and then high-volume increase, easily breaking $2.