I went all in when it was 0.000008, why didn't you buy? Stop trading crypto, just go home and farm.
大唐-
--
$PEPE People who are afraid to buy now, stop trading cryptocurrencies, go home, you are destined to regret it for a lifetime. Last time I didn't dare to go all in at 0.2 for Dogecoin, this time I went all in.
How is $ETH , brothers? Following Uncle Jiu, are we enjoying delicious food? Yesterday, I bought the dip at Ethereum 3300, the lowest point has already reached 3267, and today the highest point has reached our first take-profit level of 3450.
Next, some people can choose to take profits for safety. Those who want to continue strategizing with me can see if we can reach the second take-profit level around 3550. For those who haven't made profits, hurry up and get on board.
For those who like Uncle Jiu, please pay more attention. I wish us all a smooth journey in the cryptocurrency world $ETH
Compared to lunc, the only improvement is that the stablecoin will not go to zero
概率天鹅
--
What is the relationship between $USUAL usual and the stablecoin usd0? This question is actually very simple: usual is a token that issues rewards to usd0. usual itself cannot generate profits; it needs to rely on the market to continuously drive up the token price to feed back to the usd0 collateral holders. However, this is a very unhealthy operating mechanism, taking money from retail investors buying usual and constantly giving it to stablecoin holders. In the early stages, it can attract retail investors to buy through continuously rising prices and high annualized returns to attract usd0 investors. But later, faced with the continuously declining yield of usd0, it fails to attract new investors and instead experiences ongoing withdrawals. usual will become a token that is even worse than a meme, just a piece of garbage that issues rewards to usd0, spiraling down like lunc. As for the bond yield guarantee, just consider it a joke. What are the project party's profits? Where will they get money to continue operations if they use bond yields for guarantees? When they need bond yields for guarantees, the game has long been over.
But unlike LUNC, stablecoin holders will not incur losses
概率天鹅
--
What is the relationship between $USUAL usual and the stablecoin usd0? This question is actually very simple: usual is a token that issues rewards to usd0. usual itself cannot generate profits; it needs to rely on the market to continuously drive up the token price to feed back to the usd0 collateral holders. However, this is a very unhealthy operating mechanism, taking money from retail investors buying usual and constantly giving it to stablecoin holders. In the early stages, it can attract retail investors to buy through continuously rising prices and high annualized returns to attract usd0 investors. But later, faced with the continuously declining yield of usd0, it fails to attract new investors and instead experiences ongoing withdrawals. usual will become a token that is even worse than a meme, just a piece of garbage that issues rewards to usd0, spiraling down like lunc. As for the bond yield guarantee, just consider it a joke. What are the project party's profits? Where will they get money to continue operations if they use bond yields for guarantees? When they need bond yields for guarantees, the game has long been over.