$ADA has finally started!\nSell to the followers when the target price is reached,\nThose who are fortunate to receive the plate, feel free 😉

It's almost that time, $BNB

$ADA price 0.33
Back to the DCA fragrant area～
Welcome to purchase～

$ADA 🥕 🫏
ADA believers, drooling every day dreaming of ADA returning to 3 dollars.
This temptation is like the carrot that is forever out of reach, fixed on the donkey's back.
🥕 🫏
Today buy at 0.3, after a round of bull market, at least ten times the return.
Invest 1000, reap 10000
Invest 10000, reap 100000.
For this dream, no matter how much the price drops, see it as a——
Trial of loyalty to oneself.
At the same time, still looking at the 4% staking yield on the old calendar,
Calculating how much to hold for “retirement life.” 🤣🤣🤣

As for them, I can only say:
Keep it up, continue to hold! Cardano Forever!!!!

$BTC Recently observed an unusual phenomenon.
As the US dollar rises, BTC, the US stock market (NASDAQ), and gold are all simultaneously increasing, showing a strong trend.

I believe the reason behind this phenomenon is "de-globalization".
The rise in asset prices is normal, but the strength of the dollar is unusual.

In the past, an important reason for the dollar moving in the opposite direction of dollar assets was the global flow of capital; once the dollar starts to lower interest rates, capital tends to flow to other regions. However, currently, capital is actually leaning towards contraction. Especially with the MAGA "ideology" in the US, which calls for the return of manufacturing and trade protectionism, all are specific manifestations of "de-globalization". By using "security" and "tariffs" to force funds to stay in the US, this leads to the peculiar phenomenon of the dollar strengthening while interest rates are lowered.

It seems that Trump has a high chance of being elected, as the recent trends in the capital markets are all based on the premise of "Trump's election".

Close, close!
Will ADA be worse than "dog" and "shit" again😏?
Looking forward to it... $SHIB

Back then, I commented under the Dog Daily:
ADA can't rise above DOGE, mocked by the followers + blocked by Dog Daily
And now 😏
ADA isn't even worthy to carry DOGE's shoes
🤣🤣🤣

$BNB
After more than half a year of experimenting with mining strategies, I have abandoned this strategy. The strategy was to obtain tokens through LaunchPool and hold without selling.
The result is that the mining projects coming out of LaunchPool are increasingly garbage, with several projects dropping by 70%. Calculating it, it would have been better to sell from the start.

If one project drops, that's one thing, but in reality, all LaunchPool projects exhibit this trend. From the data I've observed, I changed my strategy midway and began to sell a portion once trading was possible. From the results, this operation proved to be correct and avoided potential losses.

Currently, my BNB strategy has shifted to selling at the opening. I have already implemented this strategy in some recent mining projects. For SCR, which is clearly garbage among garbage, I disposed of it without hesitation at the opening.

If Binance continues to persistently list these garbage coins, the price of BNB will surely have a "surprise" in the future. This is also why I will not hold BNB, because the value of this coin is gradually collapsing with each new garbage listing.

If Bitcoin is considered "gold",
then BNB is somewhat like Binance's "stock".
Investing in BNB is to obtain dividends (BNB burn + mining).
So if future mining projects continue to be predominantly garbage, the price of BNB will definitely collapse. — Just like a losing company.

Do you remember when ADA's staking rewards were close to 4%?
Now the staking is around 2%.
The rewards from cold wallet staking are also roughly around 2.5%.

What does this indicate?

1. Many people are staking.
2. Few people are using it.

The decline in yield clearly shows that Cardano is gradually becoming a staking pyramid scheme. Most are just staking to earn coins. The ecosystem is still very underdeveloped, and almost no one is using it. Transaction fees and others cannot cover the losses from the reward pool and the increasing number of interest earners.
By the way, based on this trend, by 2025, the annualized yield may be below 2%.

If you want to earn interest, I suggest you deposit in a bank instead of putting it on this chain to go to waste.

It seems that in the retirement plan of Dog Daily, the 4% yield is probably only a dream.

$ETH $SOL
Let's talk about the current views on positions.
After a period of research, I plan to invest the subsequent funds into ETH and SOL, with ETH taking the larger share.
The reason ETH takes the larger share is that, compared to SOL, ETH has a higher degree of decentralization. SOL, due to its unique HPOS mechanism, inevitably leads to centralization.
This centralization causes a problem: large funds will not keep themselves in this system for long periods. If this issue is not substantively improved, this system will not have much development in the long run.
Although some operations regarding ETH are quite annoying, for now, I can only pinch my nose and invest.
SOL indeed has potential, so I will allocate a portion of my position to buy it, but considering the risks, I can't invest too much. Currently, I mainly buy the Ponke meme coin, purely out of personal preference, not for investment purposes.
Additionally, although ADA, this truly bad coin, has been criticized, theoretically, ADA can carry large funds. However, whether large funds will enter this ghost chain is something only ghosts know. The problem with ghost chains has always been the lack of ecology. Moreover, the decentralization is too much, turning it into a retail chain.

$SCR Sold around 1.22 before the market opened, not planning to hold long.
Reasons are two:
1 Domestic project, better to be cautious
2 The icon is too ugly, don't want to hold.

...Just joking
Actually, I don't have a good impression of all L2 projects. One reason is that the competition is too fierce, and the other reason is that the experience on these L2s isn't that great.

$ADA
"The great Confucian speaks for me"🤣

$SOL is studying SOL and may change positions.
But to be honest, Solana has many problems and needs more evaluation.
If it is not ideal, it may be abandoned.
However, for some projects, the more you study them, the more you find that they are not good.
I won’t mention the specific names.

$ADA Is ADA really bad?

When I first entered the cryptocurrency circle, I watched a youtube channel called "Blockchain Dog Daily". I was fooled by this clothes seller and invested in ADA.
As a result, I have lost a lot of money now.
If you read the comments of Dog Daily, you will find that they are all flattering. It is so disgusting that I can't bear to read it. But why are they all flattering? ——Because this "Dog Daily" is very narrow-minded. It was blocked after commenting: "ADA can't rise above doge" 🤣. Only its loyal believers can comment, so it is naturally peaceful. In fact, so far, what I said is right.

Let me talk about several aspects of ADA.

1 "Don't just look at the price, you have to see the future."

Price reflects the future to a certain extent. If ada is really optimistic, why is the trading volume and price down? Of course, because this thing itself has no future.

2 "Decentralization"
The biggest problem with ADA is its "decentralization". Decentralization means: all retail investors. A project without a leader means that the chips are loose. It is difficult for the price to go up.

3 "When there was no contract, the price was $3; now there is a contract, the price is more than $3"
ADA was biased towards "centralization" at the beginning, and the $3 at that time was the result of institutional manipulation. Now it is "decentralized", the distribution is completed, and the price is finished.

4 "Unpopular development language"
ADA's development language is Haskell, and this "functional" programming language has a high threshold for use. This makes it difficult to promote. The reliability of modern software comes from testing, not design. The little security brought by design will never be as reliable as a large number of tests.

Subsequent views.
I actually still hold some ADA. When BTC was relatively low, I felt something was wrong, so my main positions were on BTC. If you foolishly believe in the conscientious recommendations of some KOLs, you will lose a lot. After a careful study of ADA, I feel more and more that this coin is really not good.

I will choose to gradually clear my positions at a similar price. After all, if the bull market really comes, ADA, as a coin in the top ten (note: not the top few 😂😂😂) by market capitalization, should still be able to rise a little.

$BTC I apologize for the prediction I posted before. It was not "A kill" originally,
but "N" in the end!

Niu Niu !!! !!! !!!

$BTC BTC has taken out the classic "A kill" pattern of big A!

$BTC "Virtual currency will eventually return to zero, while A-shares stand up after breaking 3,000 points"
History repeats itself again.
I wonder what the result will be this time?

$ADA 0.6, part of it was sold at 0.4 today.
0.4 is a historical obstacle, bet it won't get through this time.

If you sell it, change the warehouse

$BTC I remember that at the beginning of the year, I often saw a kind of rhetoric:
"Everyone knows that there will be a bull market in 2025, and even fools can make money, how is it possible?"
But feel the atmosphere now,
"The bull market is over!" "It's the beginning of the bear market now, run quickly!"
With the shaky K-line, even if there is a high probability of a bull market in 2025, are you starting to doubt it?
Under the bombardment of news, the shrinking of assets, and the influence of various analysis lions, even if you know about the bull market, it is not that simple.
Perhaps only the "fools" who firmly believe in it can make money. . .

$BNB Regarding the latest mining amount allocation strategy, many people in the square say it is unfair. If 100 is deposited in two pools, both should be calculated as 100, instead of automatically dividing into 50 and 50. . . Are these people's maths correct? If everyone is divided into 50, doesn't the ratio remain unchanged? If you look carefully, the mining amount before and after the allocation is basically the same. Why do you have to play word games and make it 100 for everyone? It's hard to understand. (Wanting to allocate the ratio by yourself is another topic, which is ignored here) I finally understand the underlying logic of why A shares soared after 10 for 10🤣