The current situation is that absolute power will inevitably lead to absolute corruption. A large number of projects no longer seek to win-win with financiers, users, and developers, but instead gamble on limited stock, use the rights ceded by all parties, and engage in fraud and corruption under the slogan of achieving the great revival of the project. It is very likely that the project owners will find that this round of bull market is no longer an unlimited resource, and in limited resources, my project may not only have no disruptive innovation ideas, but also be difficult to create ripples in the short term when developing incremental applications. If I can't get it done, I can't start a business in vain, I have to get the money first. Note that in traditional industries, there are no customers and things can't be sold. Entrepreneurs can't get rich at all, but the Internet model has set a precedent, but it is mainly to cheat the financiers' money and improve their lives. The blockchain industry is even more of a scam by financiers and small shareholders. This industry really needs to be properly regulated! If you can get it done, you want to get it done, but you can't get it done in the short term, what should you do? Don't be shameless first, and store food for the winter. If my project owner can't make money from the market, can't I cheat money from investors? I think most project owners are the former. They knew they couldn't get it done, so they got money first. A few project owners think that they can start well, and they just need the market to give them time. However, seeing that other project owners are so well-off, they can’t help but follow suit and make some money first. Whoever trusts the project the most will start with the person they trust the most. VC projects really don’t care about their reputation.