I used to like to analyze football, through European and Asian handicaps, odds, Kelly index, etc. At the beginning, I just liked to watch football and analyze the formations and playing styles of both sides. Later, I found that it was not perfect and there were always pitfalls. Later, I began to analyze how the dealer opened the market, whether it was a fake market or a real market. Finally, I found that it was better not to analyze blindly for a while. Even if it was verified occasionally, it would be the same next time. In the end, I found that the more I learned, the more chaotic it was, so it was better to rely on intuition. First impression. Now some people in the currency circle are learning technology in this way. Technology is just an auxiliary. How can it be possible to judge the market 100% correctly? Some people, in pursuit of perfection, learn this school of technology today. After learning for a while, they feel so awesome. As a result, I found that many markets did not follow this, but another school was very good at judging this wave of market, so I went to learn from them. Then over time, Xiaomi seemed to be getting more and more, but there was no progress at all and I doubted my life. It is better to be at ease than to learn in a messy way. No matter what you do. And there is no such thing as 100% correct. Specialization and precision are the best. Only by constantly improving a field can you become stronger and stronger.
