Ordinary people sometimes have very different perceptions of things.

Ordinary retail investors may think that BTC is too expensive, and that copycats are cheap, and copycats have risen more than BTC, but after a round, the result is that they cannot outperform BTC.

The copycat here is a collective concept. Not all copycats can outperform BTC. Only a few can outperform. You need to work hard to find these copycats.

If the foundation is not deep enough, the result is that BTC is still 63,000, but everyone is losing money. They don’t buy those that have risen high, fearing that they will fall and be trapped. They buy those that have not risen. The fact is that not all those that have risen high will not continue to rise.

Not all those that have not risen will rise. Those that have risen high are still setting new highs, and those that have not risen or have risen less continue not to rise or rise less.

For example, what is the core of the rdnt gmx problem?

High rise, no rise, and small rise are just superficial phenomena. We must grasp its essence and figure out why it has risen high, no rise, or small rise.

Therefore, we can judge whether it will continue to rise high, or make up for the rise, or not rise in the future.