[Core bugs and concerns in the TON ecosystem, and solutions:]
Neither the original TG dialog-style projects nor the projects operated outside telegram can support the TG ecological vision. The operational friendliness of TON is inseparably related to the original version of Telegram itself.
If many of the TON ecosystem can only be operated outside the TG, and the inside of the TG is in text box mode, then this is a big operating experience problem. The core imagination point of Telegram web3 is definitely not such a text box.
The solution is the IME version, a development model that adds button functions and multi-chains to telegram, which is more in line with people's imagination about the TG ecology. Contains all the original TG and TON functions and an additional version adapted to Web3. Users can operate dex, cross-chain bridge, and cex functions with buttons
The ime lime version of telegram is not that popular in the Chinese area, and I personally think that their marketing capabilities are far weaker than their technical strength. But there are already many people using it within European and American institutions. Because Ime has basically not entered the Asia-Pacific market, it is just a Ukrainian who speaks very broken Chinese. On the contrary, TON feels that it is mainly taken over by Chinese, so if TON joins forces with Lime, it will probably be a very useful scenario.
I don’t know if they regard it as a competitive relationship, or if Telegram wants to acquire it, but it seems to me that there is no competitive relationship but a mutually beneficial relationship.
