Questions swirl around Smart Layer's $SLN token airdrop. Get the inside scoop on the unfolding controversy.
Smart Layer's recent airdrop of its $SLN token has ignited a firestorm of controversy. Users are raising concerns about the distribution process, with allegations of unfair practices and a lack of transparency.
Some are questioning the legitimacy of the airdrop itself, suggesting that it might be a way to artificially inflate the token's value. Others are frustrated by what they see as a failure to communicate clearly about eligibility requirements and distribution timelines.
Smart Layer has yet to issue a comprehensive statement addressing the accusations. The lack of response is further fueling speculation and causing some users to lose trust in the project.
As the situation continues to develop, it raises important questions about the fairness and ethics of cryptocurrency airdrops. Should there be more oversight in how these events are conducted? What responsibility do projects have to be transparent about their distribution methods?