Today, I feel like talking to you about the relationship between China, the United States and Russia and the conflict in economic development.
Why can the Russian bear, which has a notorious reputation internationally, stand on the same front with the University of Tokyo? The answer is simple: with the United States, the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
So the friendship between the bear and the rabbit depends on the bald eagle. If Trump stops helping Ukraine, I believe the bear will be the first to turn against the rabbit. Many people think that the rabbit and the bear are a family, but this is all forced. Even in terms of trade, the trade between the rabbit and the United States is much easier than the trade between the bear and the rabbit.
In terms of location, the bear and the rabbit are neighbors. This alone has caused countless conflicts over the years, and I won’t talk about the territorial issues involved here. How were the bears and rabbits forced to join forces now?
It was the United States that pushed NATO to point the gun at the face of the bear. Ukraine proposed to join NATO, and then the Russia-Ukraine conflict broke out. The Sino-Russian trade directly exploded, doubling to over $200 billion. Now the market share of the Rabbit car brand in the bear market is as high as 58%. The bear helped the Rabbit discount the oil, leaving nearly $100 billion.
Why must the Russian bear take Ukraine? It has no ports but Crimea. Ukraine is the most fertile granary in Europe. Moscow has no strategic buffer in the plains. These rigid needs and Ukraine's proposal to join NATO provide reasons for action.
If the Russian bear wants to become a world-class power, it must have a trading port, otherwise it will be trapped in the cold Siberian steppe. Crimea is the only place that the Russian bear can use as a trading port. Owning Crimea is equivalent to owning the Black Sea. At that time, 60% of the Russian bear's foreign trade was completed through the Black Sea. This is why the Russian bear must take Crimea.
Without Crimea, there will be no control over the Black Sea, and even the Caucasus region on the east coast of the Black Sea, the heartland of the Russian bear, will be seriously threatened. The Russian bear's character has always been to take a larger piece of land to protect it, so it must take the four districts bordering Crimea.
Another reason is that Ukraine has taken away a large amount of the Russian bear's industrial heritage and 34 million hectares of fertile black soil, and is the granary of Europe. So if the Russian bear takes Ukraine, it will have an outlet to the sea and military logistics. So this is why the rabbit can only support the Russian bear to a limited extent. The rabbit only needs a half-dead Russian bear, so that the Russian bear will spit out more resources to maintain its status quo;
Instead of being vigorous all the time, the Russian bear will not get any benefit. So now the Russian bear is developing the Far East for the rabbit, giving the rabbit resources and markets and allowing the construction of the China-Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan railway. It is not because the Russian bear has a change of heart, but because Zelensky has been here. Once Zelensky makes a move, the emperor will explode gold coins. Once the Russian bear takes Ukraine, it can turn around and join forces with the EU. The Russian bear will provide resources and weapons, and the EU will provide technology and consumer markets. Together, they will fork out NATO and cut off the benefits given to the rabbit.
This is unacceptable not only to the United States, but also to the rabbits. You know, Europe is the second largest market for rabbits, so the rabbits can only help the bears, but not too much.
Is it possible for the United States to defeat the rabbit and the bear one by one? In fact, it is unlikely. There are actually only two world-class chess players, one is the United States and the other is the rabbit. NATO's targeting of the bear is actually forcing the rabbit to take action. The rabbit can now be put on the chessboard, but it is still unrealistic for the current economic and trade situation to stand alone against the United States.
Why do we say that there are only two chess players? The Russian bear is also very strong. However, it has no ability to produce all the industrial and daily necessities for people's livelihood. The sudden decline in people's living standards will lead to social instability and large-scale demonstrations, and may even cause the Russian bear to disintegrate for the second time.
This is the script that NATO had given to the bear before, but the rabbit didn't expect that the bear would be easily covered by the rabbit before it could do anything. There was no aid, just normal trade. This is the world's first industrial power. The United States is not fighting the bear, but the rabbit.
If you want to blame someone, just blame the bear for being too fat and the rabbit for being too good at giving milk, so we are stuck like this now.
The reason why the United States must suppress the Rabbit is very simple. It is the conflict of underlying logic. If the Rabbit wants to carry out a second economic transformation, it must convert its national debt into bonds issued to the world, that is, to expand its economy overseas.
The only way to express this is to harvest global capital through commodities, airplanes, ships, and cars. What the United States and its friends can show off the most now are airplanes, ships, and cars, especially airplanes. Boeing is already the only industrial powerhouse of the United States.
So the key lies here. If the Rabbit wants to transform and go overseas, it will inevitably have to compete with the United States for jobs. If the United States wants to maintain its hegemony, it must suppress the Rabbit and make it fall into the middle-income economy trap.
You should know that the United States only started its hegemony after completing its second economic transformation. The most classic example is U.S. debt. If you don’t buy U.S. debt, I will fight you. If you buy U.S. debt, I can’t guarantee that I won’t fight you. Therefore, the contradiction between Rabbit and the United States is irreconcilable.
Anyone who says that the United States can put aside its prejudice against the rabbit cannot be believed, even if that person is Trump. The United States needs to maintain its hegemony in order to suck blood, and sucking blood can feed its military hegemony. These are complementary, and one wrong step will lead to all the wrong steps.
Therefore, the United States cannot cheat the rabbits who worship the dock. If you become the big brother and others come to you to pay homage, I will not be able to suck their blood. If I can't suck blood, I will have no money. If I have no money, I will have no overseas military bases and collapse.
Anyway, Rabbit thinks that the United States cannot fall now, because even the worst rules are better than no rules. Rabbit is not yet capable of being the captain. Someone has to take the position of the boss. If no one takes it, it will enter a state of chaos. The current state is actually quite good, giving enough time for development.
After ten years, the rabbit will be strong enough, and there are plenty of ways to make a dishonest rabbit behave itself.
Now is the era of revival, which can help many people achieve financial freedom. For example, isn't the construction of the China-Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan railway a great boon to some bulk raw materials? The China-Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan related sectors are already good, especially Xinjiang, where the railway infrastructure and cement blasting in Xinjiang are sure to have received large orders from companies.