#BitcoinKeyZone More method
Facticity, empiricism, regarding the facts, the events, what happens (to us), the everyday: in any treatise on research and development, these issues are quickly associated with three: validity, reliability, and trustworthiness.
Validity: it is essential to consider that we must support our research and social communications with accuracy and truthfulness of the results, establishing that by using our techniques, instruments, and data we effectively value, measure, evaluate what we want and say we are evaluating.
Reliability: it is to consider the coherence, persistence, in such a way that it ensures that stable similar results will be produced if applied in other situations but which have similar conditions to those we are referring to.
Trustworthiness: it is to consider the degree of precision within the relationship of the data used, the results, and the conclusions being free of methodological, technical, instrumental, systematic errors.
(( TRUSTWORTHINESS ... playing with words in Spanish, sorry, is almost like saying "dignity" )).
And one more step, 4th. Criterion, of methodological synthesis: Objectivity 👌
Being objective is NOT having no stance, that is a vain pretense.
Being objective IS having a stance, well explicated, well-founded, that establishes how we communicate that the results and conclusions achieved respond to the 3 preceding criteria.
Would you add any more criteria???. Go ahead, so you can advance with your own quality standard. Nowadays, we still like the path (not exempt from challenge, uncertainty, and faith on our part)) that BTC is tracing
and also USUAL