Presenting an alternative perspective on the prevailing dynamics of incineration taxes. What if the incineration tax vaulted to an astounding 5%? Envision the ripple effect within the media—utter clarity on the ramifications surfaces. A 5% incineration levy per transaction would culminate in an eye-watering 10% for a complete round trip. This prospect, a financial minefield, would deter new entrants and potentially prompt existing stakeholders to flee.

Now, contemplate the scenario where the incineration tax boldly escalates to 3%. A weighty 3%, especially when imposed on each and every transaction.

However, if this 3% were to be enforced during trading activities, a stark reality emerges—I am firmly convinced that the only halting their operations would be the automated bots.

At best, arbitrage bots would grind to a halt, leaving behind a vacuum of trading activities restricted to broader cycles. Such a trajectory spells discord for the entirety of the $LUNC chain. Consequently, a 3% tax threshold emerges as a non-starter. But what about a more moderate 2 percent? I posit that a similar set of challenges would inevitably rear their heads.

The fabric of trading often leans heavily on automated bots to sustain transaction volumes. Should each bot-driven trade bear the burden of such a substantial incineration tax load, the prospect of engaging in short-term trading would dwindle to nil. Paradoxically, this very practice is a common sight within the realm of deception—a realm where one can effortlessly elude risks and reap rewards, leading inexorably to a downfall.

Upon prolonged contemplation and attentive listening, a stark reality emerges—while amplifying the incineration tax might lend a sweeter allure to the rewards, the unvarnished truth persists: the bearer of hardships ultimately remains oneself. Reflect on this: even if an offer of interest is extended, what value does it hold if the coin's value stagnates? While other chains ascend to new heights, your coin remains stagnant, a stark juxtaposition. Ergo, the clarion call for reform reverberates louder than ever. Entrusting the fate of $LUNC solely to exorbitant incineration taxes signifies a one-way ticket to failure. It is the judicious fusion of lower tax brackets with cyclical incineration that shall unfurl the banner of success, ushering $LUNC back to its former eminence. Through the incineration machinery orchestrated by $DFC, the pace of incineration could witness a significant surge, potentially outpacing the prevailing incineration tempo observed on #Binance.

But heed this: in the absence of decisive action, failure stands as the inevitable denouement.