Wealth is a reward for cognition. There is a premise that those with cognition have a sufficiently large motivation to pursue wealth.
High cognition is a necessary but not sufficient condition for wealth, so being extremely wise does not necessarily imply that a person is very rich.
A foolish rich person may only be considered foolish in certain aspects that you perceive; that is your viewpoint, and you may not see their high cognition.
Foolishness does not necessarily preclude wealth, and wisdom does not guarantee it. Cognition is a necessary but not sufficient condition for wealth.
I see some people questioning why fools can also be wealthy and the explanations given. Does what I say make sense? If you see my message, I hope you will reply and discuss it together.