Criticism of the Pnut and Act projects is warranted, as they are similar to last year's BabyGrok, and by not getting involved with them, they avoided a disastrous outcome.

Firstly, in terms of time cost, looking back over the past two weeks, the Ripple King had a retaliatory rally, and many classic old projects were also rallying during the same period, but these two brothers fluctuated with poor performance, like 'human-machine projects.' They deserve strong criticism; they neither allow the bulls to profit nor the bears to benefit, only care about their own turmoil.

As for the Act project, it once surged 20 times in an instant, then published an article claiming that an anonymous trader made tens of millions of dollars on-chain, and finally stated that the team suffered significant losses in some areas, but it feels that both gains and losses are unrelated to itself. Even if the institutions go to zero, it remains unscathed.

Although these two projects may rally in the future, they currently lack cost-effectiveness, so they deserve severe criticism.