Your post raises valid concerns about Blum's airdrop, reflecting skepticism that's crucial in the crypto space. Here’s a quick analysis:

1. Marketing vs. Substance: Many airdrops are designed to generate hype, often without delivering tangible value. Blum's case might align with this trend if their promises remain unfulfilled.

2. Minimal Returns: Highlighting the potential value of 200,000 points being just $2–$5 underscores the risk/reward imbalance, especially for those investing significant time in such schemes.

3. Risk of Speculation: The caution against speculative ventures is apt. Many tokens fail to list or hold value, leaving participants disappointed.

For readers, it’s a timely reminder to evaluate airdrops critically, assess the credibility of projects, and prioritize transparency and utility over hype. It’s not just about avoiding Blum but fostering smarter participation in the crypto ecosystem.

#Write2Earn! #GaryGenslerResignation #GaryGenslerResignation #JoblessClaimsLowestApril #COSSocialFiRevolution