Early-stage various types of assets are often accompanied by many dramatic situations, such as the difficulty of information acquisition and cognitive biases among people. These factors combined can easily lead to the phenomenon of mispricing of assets.
And this is precisely one of the most interesting aspects of on-chain assets. Imagine if there were no disagreements in the market, no contradictions, then there wouldn't be cases of wrongful killing or mispricing, and perhaps there wouldn't be so many opportunities for overnight wealth, and those legendary stories would naturally have no room for discussion.
In contrast, the biggest problem often faced by project tokens is the issue of "reasonable pricing." If paired with a predatory token model, it can become very uninteresting and hard to engage with.
In fact, the value of a quality on-chain asset is not only fixed and shaped in the initial stage, but rather it exists in a dynamic process that changes over time.
What is even more interesting is that as the community continues to grow and develop, the fundamentals of the asset will also continuously adjust accordingly, rather than being static and stagnant.