I can't get over the feeling of some kind of dissonance. It is caused on the one hand by the failure of the "hamsters", and on the other hand by the possible success of the "imperialists".
Planning ahead is, of course, a thankless task, but nevertheless, this is what everyone does, especially in the world of crypto.
So, I'm sitting here and thinking. Let's say that everything went according to plan for the X-Empire developers and the long-awaited drop took place on time, then the listing, and then the price increase.
And all this is hypothetical, of course.
In parallel to this, we observe a picture of hamsters sinking to the bottom one after another.
Why is this so? And can these two projects be compared?
I think it is quite possible to compare them, because they are both variations of the same phenomenon.
But why will the "x-empire" be a success, while the "hamsters" will be reset..? If this really happens, it will be extremely strange and illogical.
Just imagine what huge financial investments were made into the hamster project from advertising alone. What kind of advertisers were not there... banks, bookmakers, the Yandex ecosystem and much more.
What kind of advertising have you seen from the "imperialists"? Apart from some notorious "Subscribe to the channel..." I personally haven't seen anything.
Therefore, it seems to me that if even hamsters with such huge financial injections were unable to maintain a decent mark after listing on the stock exchange, then the “x-empire” definitely has no chance of success, alas.
P. S.
But I would very much like to be wrong.