Based on the posts found on X so far, Trump’s attitude towards cryptocurrencies seems to be positive, especially in his most recent post, where he mentioned: “I promised to Make America Great Again, this time with crypto.” This suggests that if he is elected president, he may adopt friendly and supportive policies to promote the development of cryptocurrencies. Trump also mentioned @WorldLibertyFi’s plan to help the United States become a global cryptocurrency hub, which further strengthens his crypto-friendly stance.
However, it is important to note that the policies and positions of political candidates may change over time and as the political environment changes. These views of Trump are obtained from posts on X and represent some of his gestures during the campaign, but actual policies and implementation may be different. In addition, statements made by political candidates may sometimes be motivated by the need to win over voters and may not fully reflect their actual policies after taking office.
Overall, based on the available information, Trump appears to be friendly toward cryptocurrencies, but his ultimate policies and actual level of support for cryptocurrencies remain to be seen, especially after he is potentially elected president.
According to current Internet information and posts on X, Kamala Harris has not made a direct and clear statement or policy position on cryptocurrency as clearly expressed as Trump. However, we can make some inferences from her and the policy tendencies of the Democratic Party she represents:
1. Regulatory tendencies: Democrats are generally cautious about emerging technology fields, especially decentralized and relatively unregulated fields like cryptocurrencies. Harris participated in regulatory discussions on cryptocurrencies as vice president, emphasizing consumer protection and preventing cryptocurrencies from becoming a tool for illegal activities, which suggests that she may support stricter regulation.
2. Technological progress and innovation: Nevertheless, the Democratic Party also emphasizes technological progress and innovation. Harris has demonstrated support for innovation in other areas, such as technology and the environment. This may mean that she is open to the potential of cryptocurrency technology but will emphasize the importance of regulation.
3. Social equity and economic opportunity: Harris and other Democratic members often advocate for social equity and economic opportunity. This may mean that in terms of cryptocurrency policy, she may focus on how to make this field of technology open to everyone, especially those groups that are disadvantaged in the traditional financial system.
4. Discussions on X: On X, while there were no direct posts from Harris about cryptocurrencies, the discussion often mentioned the Democratic Party’s dilemma on cryptocurrencies: on the one hand, the promotion of innovation and technological progress, and on the other hand, concerns about financial stability and consumer protection.
In summary, although Harris did not express a friendly stance towards cryptocurrencies as directly as Trump did, it can be inferred that she may take a balanced attitude, neither completely rejecting the development of cryptocurrencies nor letting them go completely, but preferring to promote their development through strict supervision. This means that the cryptocurrency industry may face more compliance requirements and supervision, but at the same time it may also receive some form of official recognition and support to ensure its legitimacy and stability.
