This is exactly the title I would write if I wanted to feed my subscribers with shit. Let's take things in order.
The publication is too big and does not fit into 1 post, continuation in the comments, full version in telegraph - click
Disclaimer: there will be a lot of swearing and unpleasantness, so this publication is not recommended for anyone to read, especially communists.
🦊 Personally, I conducted a small study on how satisfied users are with the drop, based on which only 16% of users are satisfied with the drop, of which only 1.5% are very satisfied. Not a super indicator, of course) as many as 84% are negative. But what if I say that this is exactly how it should have been? But first things first.
💬 In old posts:
I have written many times and tried to convey the idea that NOTcoin has planted a completely false narrative in the minds of many drophunters, like you can click something and you are a good man - here are tens, or no, hundreds of dollars. For what? For nothing, for being such a good man. In fact, drophunter works on the principle: a service for a reward. First, you provide a service to the project, being its free tester or financial supporter, and only then, if the project is doing well, you receive a reward. It has always been this way and it always will be this way.
💎 Why did NOTcoin succeed?
Yes, because it was possible to shut their mouths first of all. The application had 17 million active users (which is much less than in other large applications now), most of whom came in the last days before the listing and did not receive anything, a good part was shaved off, etc. A good drop, and not $ 10-20, was received by those who had been in the project for a long time + the channel admins did their job, spreading the first of its kind project to everyone and everywhere. And even users who were not familiar with NOTcoin got a feeling of freebies. You probably won't believe it, but the number of users who received $ 100 + on NOTcoin at the time of the drop (and not when the cap grew 6 times and reached $ 3 billion) is approximately the same as the number of users who will receive $ 100 + on cats.
💰 The most important thing: About the user price.
If I participate in a project, I mean something. NO! Your price is 3 cents, okay, 5 cents (to make it more pleasant). At this price, projects sell each other "free" users. Yes, most of us are just traffic, most application users cannot be monetized by their developers and must simply sell to each other. If your contribution to the project is limited to "participation": launched cats and put them in a big cat - you are worth 5 cents. No more. Not pleasant, right? What a faggot, what a boar, saying such unpleasant things? What can you do.
And there are more expensive users, those who are ready to donate a little, just to be noticed, but the price for such a user is already 2-3 dollars. For users who are on first-name terms with crypto, you have to fork out 20 dollars, and for those who are on first-name terms with crypto, and are also ready to bring money to the project, oh, the price for such users can even be measured in hundreds of dollars.
Do you feel the difference? Yes, it is colossal, one pro-cryptan can cost as much as several thousand "participants". That is the difference. Who do you think is more profitable for the project developers to satisfy? The answer is obvious: it is better to keep one useful fatso in your community than a thousand lovers of freebies.
🛠 Why can't we give everyone equally, depending on their contribution to the project?
Point one: your time is worthless if it can't be monetized. By adding up the cats, you gave the project 0, you gave the project nothing. And the user who brought money gave development, gave an argument in a dispute with exchanges, gave money for development, for employee salaries, design, and so on. And the user who brought a bunch of friends gave an audience, gave users who will also bring money, and so on.
In fact, that's what they gave everyone for their contribution to the project; folding cats wasn't a contribution to the project, it was just a waste of time, but they did give a little bit for that, purely symbolically, a few dollars for high levels.
🫶 But the project is built on users!!!!!
#AirdropGuide #catizen #cati #NOT🚀 #notcoin $NOT