Odaily Planet Daily News Vitalik wrote on X: "I don't think that 'anonymous society' or even 'financialized pseudonymous society' is really effective. A more dimensional concept of identity (with the characteristics of 'soul binding') seems to be necessary; if you don't do this, the most stable governance structure will only be a de facto centralized structure, and others will be attacked by financialized governance. It can be said that even today we can see these problems at work in DAO. Anomymity is a check and balance that exists to run the 'dark side of the cycle', and it cannot run the entire cycle by itself. Just like you can't run a society with permanent rebellious energy. Regarding x-risk, I think pluralistic thinking can actually help us more effectively find out x-risk mitigation measures that people can support." A user said: "I think we need a concept of dual (or multiple) identities, rather than it often being framed as either one or the other... The ideal is to be able to switch between them in a wallet." Vitalik agreed: "Make a granular choice of how much to disclose, and choose the minimum viable disclosure for each application. This is a principle that many zk applications are already designing." Furthermore, he argues that whether a governance action is abused cannot be inferred simply by observing the action itself. The same is true for culture, which behaves similarly to governance in these respects.