Former OpenAI employee William Saunders says the company's R.M.S. He explained that he was leaving the job because he felt he was heading for a disaster like the Titanic's tragic end in 1912. Saunders stated that during his three years at OpenAI, he questioned whether the company was following a path like the Apollo program or Titanic.

According to Saunders, OpenAI's overall ethos places a higher priority on product development than implementing reasonable security measures. It paints a picture of an office where employees who raise safety concerns are punished and leadership is focused on profit.

“Over time, I felt like the decisions the leadership was making were starting to look more like the decisions of the White Star Line, which built the Titanic,” Saunders said.

But there are others, such as former chief scientist Ilya Sutskever, who has stated that he is "confident" that OpenAI can achieve its goals safely.

So, who or what is the iceberg in this case? If the passengers are us – all of humanity – the iceberg may represent the existential threat that ChatGPT and similar systems can pose to an unprepared society. But if the passengers are shareholders and stakeholders who expect OpenAI to create AI as smart as humans, perhaps the iceberg represents the bursting of the generative AI bubble.#OpenAI#AI #Blockchain

What are your thoughts? We are waiting your comments.