PANews reported on July 5 that Max Resnick, director of research at SMG, said on the X platform: "MEV is fundamentally about the issue of control. Proposers have the right to decide which transactions can enter the block and the order in which they appear. In other words, MEV is all about censorship and reordering. The good news is that this problem can be solved. The first step is to solve censorship resistance, and we know how to do it: use multiple parallel proposers. If you are a consensus researcher and want to work with us to study multiple proposers, we have funds available. The second step is to solve the reordering problem. Once we have a multi-proposer architecture, the proposers will reach a consensus on a set of disordered transactions, and then the execution layer will be responsible for sorting them according to deterministic rules."
In this regard, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin commented: “Does this just lead to people collecting MEV by sending a large number of transactions to the chain to maximize their chances of being first? So you still get the ‘MEV auction’, but it will bring more negative externalities to the protocol. We saw this in the IC0 era in 2017, when some projects tried to ban transactions with gas prices above 50, resulting in a lot of on-chain spam.”
