The largest US banks have demonstrated their resilience against a severe recession, successfully passing the Federal Reserve’s annual stress tests.
This year, all 31 central banks, including JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, and Bank of America, met regulatory standards despite facing a hypothetical scenario where unemployment soared to 10%.
In this stress test scenario, the banks faced potential losses approaching $685 billion, the most significant hit to their capital in six years. Commercial real estate prices plummeted by 40%, office vacancies surged, and house prices dropped by 36%. The results have reassured regulators that these banks are well-prepared to withstand such economic turmoil. Michael Barr, the Fed’s vice-chair for supervision, stated, “This year’s stress test shows that large banks have sufficient capital to withstand a highly stressful scenario and meet their minimum capital ratios.”
Capital requirements and financial stability
The stress tests measure the minimum capital banks need relative to their assets to absorb losses. This capital is crucial for maintaining financial stability during economic downturns. The results enable banks to inform investors about potential shareholder payouts. Starting Friday afternoon, they can provide updates on their new capital requirements.
JPMorgan, however, expressed concerns about the Fed’s calculations. The bank claimed its assessments showed lower unrealized gains on its securities portfolio than those predicted by the Fed. This isn’t the first time banks have disputed the Fed’s findings. In 2023, both Bank of America and Citigroup disagreed with some initial results of the stress tests.
Historical context and criticisms
The annual stress testing began after the 2008 financial crisis as a significant step in restoring confidence in the banking sector. Over the years, the largest banks have generally passed these tests by a wide margin, leading to questions about the tests’ usefulness and purpose. Critics argue that consistently passing these tests might indicate the need for more stringent requirements. The 2024 stress tests projected a drop in the banks’ aggregate tier-one capital ratio, their central cushion against losses, by 2.8 percentage points.
This is the most significant drop since 2018. The Fed attributed the more considerable losses to higher expected losses on credit card loans, which increased nearly 20% from the previous year.
Investor updates and future outlook
The stress tests allow banks to update investors about potential shareholder payouts. Starting Friday afternoon, banks can provide updates on their new capital requirements. These updates are crucial for investors to understand these banks’ financial stability and potential returns.
JPMorgan raised concerns about the Fed’s calculations, stating that its assessments showed lower unrealized gains on its securities portfolio than those predicted by the Fed. This discrepancy highlights ongoing debates between banks and regulators regarding the accuracy of stress test results. In 2023, both Bank of America and Citigroup also disputed some initial findings of the stress tests.
The annual stress tests have been critical for maintaining financial stability since the 2008 financial crisis. While the tests have successfully ensured that banks hold sufficient capital, their consistent passage by large banks has led to calls for more stringent requirements. The 2024 stress tests showed a significant drop in the banks’ aggregate tier-one capital ratio, their primary cushion against losses, by 2.8 percentage points, the most substantial decline since 2018. This decrease was largely due to higher expected losses on credit card loans, which rose nearly 20% from the previous year.
The post Significant US Banks Prove Resilient Against Severe Recession first appeared on Coinfea.
