Binance Square
LIVE
LIVE
MarsNext
Bearish
--11.5k views
🚀🚀🚀 #SEC Whistleblower Reveals Chai Payments App in Terra Ecosystem Didn’t Use Crypto 🚀🚀🚀 Four cryptocurrency tokens offered by Do Kwon and Terraform Labs, the company he co-founded, have been deemed unregistered securities in a recent summary judgment ruling by Judge Jed Rakoff of the U.S. Court for the Southern District of New York. The tokens in question include #TerraUSD (UST), $LUNA , wLUNA, and Mirror Protocol (MIR). Notably, the ruling dismissed the notion that Terra’s Mirror Protocol “mAssets” constituted security-based swaps. The judgment highlighted a crucial revelation regarding the Chai payments platform, which Kwon often promoted as a real-world use case of the Terra #blockchain​ . The SEC presented evidence indicating that the Chai platform did not operate on the Terra blockchain as claimed. Payments were allegedly settled using traditional methods and then mirrored on the Terra blockchain through a server under Kwon’s control, according to an email from a Chai employee in May 2020. Moreover, a whistleblower, identified as Chai’s Chief Product Officer, disclosed that a former Terraform employee who joined Chai revealed that “there’s no crypto going on within Chai.” The whistleblower claims to have confronted Kwon about Chai’s true nature in September 2021, with Kwon allegedly showing indifference. Despite compelling evidence, Judge Rakoff acknowledged disputes of material fact, particularly concerning the credibility of whistleblowers. The defense argues that one whistleblower attempted to extort Kwon and Terra co-founder Daniel Shin after being terminated from Chai. Inconsistencies in the whistleblower’s account, including the source of information about Chai’s systems, also contribute to the disputes. Terraform CTO Chris Amani contradicts claims, stating Chai used the blockchain. The court ruled Kwon and Terraform violated U.S. law for unregistered digital currencies. Summary judgment on SEC fraud claims denied, trial scheduled for January 29, 2024. Source - Ruholamin Haqshanas @ruholamin-haqshanas Website - Cryptonews

🚀🚀🚀 #SEC Whistleblower Reveals Chai Payments App in Terra Ecosystem Didn’t Use Crypto 🚀🚀🚀

Four cryptocurrency tokens offered by Do Kwon and Terraform Labs, the company he co-founded, have been deemed unregistered securities in a recent summary judgment ruling by Judge Jed Rakoff of the U.S. Court for the Southern District of New York. The tokens in question include #TerraUSD (UST), $LUNA , wLUNA, and Mirror Protocol (MIR). Notably, the ruling dismissed the notion that Terra’s Mirror Protocol “mAssets” constituted security-based swaps.

The judgment highlighted a crucial revelation regarding the Chai payments platform, which Kwon often promoted as a real-world use case of the Terra #blockchain​ . The SEC presented evidence indicating that the Chai platform did not operate on the Terra blockchain as claimed. Payments were allegedly settled using traditional methods and then mirrored on the Terra blockchain through a server under Kwon’s control, according to an email from a Chai employee in May 2020.

Moreover, a whistleblower, identified as Chai’s Chief Product Officer, disclosed that a former Terraform employee who joined Chai revealed that “there’s no crypto going on within Chai.” The whistleblower claims to have confronted Kwon about Chai’s true nature in September 2021, with Kwon allegedly showing indifference.

Despite compelling evidence, Judge Rakoff acknowledged disputes of material fact, particularly concerning the credibility of whistleblowers. The defense argues that one whistleblower attempted to extort Kwon and Terra co-founder Daniel Shin after being terminated from Chai. Inconsistencies in the whistleblower’s account, including the source of information about Chai’s systems, also contribute to the disputes.

Terraform CTO Chris Amani contradicts claims, stating Chai used the blockchain. The court ruled Kwon and Terraform violated U.S. law for unregistered digital currencies. Summary judgment on SEC fraud claims denied, trial scheduled for January 29, 2024.

Source - Ruholamin Haqshanas @ruholamin-haqshanas

Website - Cryptonews

Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. See T&Cs.
0
Replies 2
Relevant Creator
LIVE
@MarsNext

Explore More From Creator

👉👉👉 #PhishingScams thefts on Base are up 1900% from January — #scam Sniffer Phishing scams on Ethereum #Layer2 platform Base have skyrocketed nearly 1900% since January, coinciding with a significant rise in total value locked on the network. Recent data reveals that Base experienced an 18-fold increase in cryptocurrency funds lost to phishing scams in March compared to January figures. According to blockchain anti-scam platform Scam Sniffer, approximately $3.35 million was pilfered from victims of phishing scams on Base in March alone. This surge represents a substantial 334% month-on-month jump from February, which saw losses of $773,900, and an astounding 1,880% spike from January's $169,000 losses, as reported by monthly Dune Analytics data compiled by Scam Sniffer. Notably, Binance's BNB Chain also witnessed a similar surge in phishing scams during March, according to Scam Sniffer. Across all chains, approximately $71.5 million was lost to phishing scammers from 77,529 victims in March, surpassing January and February tallies of $58.3 million and $46.8 million, respectively. Scam Sniffer highlighted fake X accounts as a prevalent tactic, detecting over 1,500 incidents in March alone. This rise in Base phishing scams coincides with a surge in memecoin activity on the platform, propelling Base's total value locked to over $3.2 billion, marking a 370% increase in 2024 so far, according to L2BEAT. Despite the increase in phishing scams, crypto hack thefts decreased by 48% to $187.2 million in March, as reported by blockchain security firm PeckShield. Source - cointelegraph.com #CryptoNews🔒📰🚫 #BinanceSquareTalks
--
👉👉👉 #TRON argues #SEC ‘not a worldwide regulator’ and lawsuit goes ‘too far’ Tron, the entity behind the layer-1 blockchain, has moved to dismiss a lawsuit filed by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), arguing that the SEC lacks jurisdiction over foreign digital asset offerings on global platforms. Tron filed a dismissal motion in a New York federal court on March 28, asserting that the SEC's lawsuit primarily targets conduct outside the United States. Tron contends that the SEC's attempt to apply U.S. securities laws to predominantly foreign conduct exceeds its jurisdiction, emphasizing that the SEC is not a global regulator and lacks authority over offerings that occur mainly outside the United States. The lawsuit, filed by the SEC last March, targeted Tron founder Justin Sun, the Tron Foundation, as well as the BitTorrent Foundation and its parent company Rainberry Inc., which Tron acquired in 2018. The SEC alleged that the sale of Tron (TRX) and #BitTorrent (BTT) tokens constituted unregistered securities offerings. Tron argues that the tokens were sold exclusively overseas, with measures taken to avoid the U.S. market. It emphasizes that the SEC did not allege that the tokens were initially offered or sold to U.S. residents. Tron also disputes the SEC's assertion that later secondary token sales on a U.S.-based platform serving users worldwide constituted unregistered U.S. securities offerings. Additionally, Tron contends that even if the SEC had jurisdiction, the tokens do not meet the criteria of investment contracts under the U.S. securities classification, as per the Howey test. Tron contests the SEC's allegations, claiming they lack specific facts and fail to identify any victims of the alleged wrongdoing. Tron criticizes the lawsuit for its lack of detailed factual allegations and reliance on generalizations. Additionally, Tron invokes the major questions doctrine, seeking dismissal. The SEC has yet to respond to Tron's motion. Source - cointelegraph.com #CryptoNews🔒📰🚫 #BinanceSquareTalks
--
👉👉👉 Vietnam leads #DEFI in ASEAN, but trading dominated by institutional investors: #OECD The OECD recently published a report shedding light on the expanding decentralized finance (DeFi) landscape in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) region. Notably, Vietnam leads in DeFi adoption, with Thailand experiencing the swiftest growth. However, despite promising growth, DeFi in ASEAN is predominantly driven by professional investors, with retail participation hampered by complexities and regulatory gaps. Although ASEAN nations aim for financial inclusion, over half of the region's 600 million residents remain unbanked. Nonetheless, the region's youthful and tech-savvy population offers fertile ground for digital asset adoption. Despite DeFi's goal of democratizing finance, ASEAN sees professional investors dominating, especially in East Asia, which boasts the highest institutional activity in DeFi worldwide. Challenges like complexity, regulatory uncertainty, provision of non-compliant services, and non-custodial setups hinder retail involvement, as highlighted by both the OECD report and a paper by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). While more user-friendly DeFi platforms have emerged, they often lack transparency and offer overly complex and leveraged trading strategies for retail traders. The OECD recommends regulatory intervention to encourage retail participation in DeFi. Moreover, traditional financial institutions could leverage DeFi in areas like atomic securities settlement. Tokenization in DeFi presents cost savings, fractionalization benefits, and capital formation opportunities through DLT. The report follows an OECD-ASEAN forum in Seoul, where officials discussed digital asset regulation and emerging trends. South Korea's FSC Vice Chair emphasized the need for regulatory frameworks to manage risks and protect consumers. Source - coingeek.com #CryptoNews🔒📰🚫 #BinanceSquareTalks
--

Latest News

View More
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs