- The Bitcoin Ordinals site faced a DDoS attack, causing a crash, which is ironic given Ordinals' criticism for spamming the Bitcoin network.
- Casey Rordamor, the creator, labeled it a DDoS, but critics like Luke Dashjr highlight Rordamor's own network "spamming."
- Dashjr's comparison of Ordinals to a heinous act intensified the already heated debate.
- Despite backlash, the Ordinals site is back up, adding more entries to the network.
- Bitcoin's network congestion worsens, with over 370,000 unconfirmed transactions and soaring fees, exacerbating the "spam" scenario.
Certainly, here's an alternative text broken down into paragraphs:
Recently, the Bitcoin Ordinals' classification as "spam" triggered a heated debate on Twitter. Almost instantly, factions emerged among developers and enthusiasts, and the exchanges of verbal jabs have persisted since.
However, a surprising twist unfolded this week. The Bitcoin Ordinals website encountered its inaugural spam attack since its inception, resulting in widespread derision and ridicule from the "anti-Ordinals squad."
The Ordinals' Website faced a Massive Crash. On December 27, a Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) attack struck the Bitcoin Ordinals website, leading to a complete blackout. In essence, DDOS attacks inundate a network with requests, overwhelming it and causing it to cease functioning.
This attack drew comparisons from critics who likened it to the impact Ordinals supposedly exert on the Bitcoin network. The irony was glaring, and detractors swiftly capitalized on it, reigniting the contentious debate.
Casey Rordamor, the creator of Bitcoin Ordinals, broke the news of the attack through a tweet, expressing bewilderment at the unprecedented crash since the website's launch.
Critics didn't hold back. Luke Dashjr, the Bitcoin core developer central to the pro versus anti-Ordinals discourse, seized the opportunity to question Rordamor's portrayal of the crash as a DDOS attack. Dashjr highlighted Rordamor's alleged hypocrisy, referencing previous arguments wherein he justified Ordinals as long as miners processed ordinal transactions.
Dashjr's criticism extends further. He once likened Ordinals on the Bitcoin network to a sensitive issue, comparing it to a now-deleted Twitter thread where he paralleled the concept to a distressing analogy.
Despite the website's restoration and the continuous inscription of ordinals on the network amid the criticism, Bitcoin's "spam" issue persists. The mempool holds over 370,000 unconfirmed transactions, causing fees to surge drastically for both standard and high-priority transactions.
Disclaimer: While aiming for accuracy, Voice of Crypto absolves itself from any potential misinformation. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile assets, necessitating thorough research before making financial decisions.