Imitation may be a word for a form of non-originality, every product that is made and valuable eventually has many imitations as a second type of original. Either for the purpose of imitation, or the inability to own the original product.

Then in the crypto world we know Bitcoin as the main pioneer of the existence of coins which were then created after the presence of Bitcoin.

If taken from the form of using the word for the existence of imitation, the question arises whether the coins after Bitcoin are included in the form of crypto imitation?

Of course, there will be many denials if it is said that forms of coins other than Bitcoin are imitation coins of Bitxoin, because their existence is not the same.

But if it is said like that, does it mean that there are no imitation coins in the crypto world?

Surely the exact answer is of course there must be. Because imitation of the original form of something must exist. And which ones can be said to be imitation coins?

For one thing this is an easy and difficult thing. Easy to categorize but difficult to justify. Why is that? Certainly because crypto originated from the existence of Botcoin and was developed freely so that if you draw a line, the origin is the same but the development is different.

Imitation in crypto may be more precisely categorized as part of a project that was born that aims only for profit. Because the vision, mission and goals are very out of the path Bitcoin was born. The number of products flooding the crypto market today does show progress in crypto development, unfortunately too many have run away from the context of what crypto was created for.