The governor of North Carolina, Ray Cooper, vetoed House Bill 690, which sought to ban CBDCs. The bill gained near-unanimous ratification in the House and Senate. House Bill 690 proposed prohibiting payments in the state powered by central bank-issued digital currencies.Â
Also Read: Justin Sun ridicules Germanyâs Bitcoin sell-off after UEFA Euro knockoutÂ
The bill was almost unanimously passed by the House and Senate, with votes coming from both Republicans and Democrats. Cooperâs veto, along with 3 other votes in the House, went against 109 votes. In the Senate, 39 votes supported the bill, while 5 vetoed it. The voting process took place in late June.
Cooper argued that House Bill 690 was premature and reactionary. He also mentioned that the legislature should have proposed additional funding to enhance cyber security and curb its associated threats.
âThis legislation is premature, vague, and reactionary and proposes an end result on important monetary decisions that havenât even been made yet⊠the legislature should have passed a budget to provide more funding for cybersecurity threats that actually exist now. Therefore, I veto the bill.â
âGovernor Cooper
Governor Cooper slammed for vetoing House Bill 690
Roy Cooper may claim to be sticking up for consumers when in reality he is cozying up to the Biden administration over the American consumer. This veto will be swiftly overridden. #ncpol https://t.co/XVem8KCF4S
â Speaker Tim Moore (@NCHouseSpeaker) July 5, 2024
Many disagreed with Cooperâs views and opinions. Mitchell Askew, head analyst of Blockware Solutions and a native of North Carolina, criticized Cooper. Mitchell explained that Cooperâs veto did not represent the views of the majority of the people he represents. Askew also added that the governorâs veto was politically motivated and, therefore, not in the interests of North Carolina residents.
âHe vetoed only because his opponent, Mark Robinson, is in favor of the bill. Itâs clear who the pro-Bitcoin and pro-freedom candidate is here.â
-Mitchell Askew
The head of industry affairs at the Blockchain Association, Dan Spuller, also disagreed with Governor Cooperâs veto. Dan emphasized that the governorâs veto sent the wrong message to the Federal Reserve that North Carolina stands with CBDCs. Dan claimed that the veto should be overridden and digital asset policies should be left in the hands of the American people and not individual representatives.
âBy vetoing this bill, the governor missed an opportunity to send a clear message to the Federal Reserve that North Carolina stands united against the creation of a CBDC. This veto must be overridden.â
-Dan SpullerÂ
Fed Chair Jerome Powell comments on CBDC adoption
The news comes as Jerome Powell, the Federal Reserve Chair, announced on March 7th that the United States was not even close to developing or adopting a fully functional central bank digital currency. Jerome also added that the central bank lacked interest in developing a central bank digital currency.
Also read: Miner âcapitulationâ in the Bitcoin network nears FTX implosion levels, CryptoQuantÂ
Before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, Jerome insisted that developing and adopting a CBDC would allow the government to survey all transactions like China does with its digital yuan. Jerome stated that if the Federal Reserve were to develop a CBDC, the digital currency would be done through the banking sector.
Â
Cryptopolitan reporting by Collins J. Okoth