Binance Square
SecGov
113,723 views
48 Posts
Hot
Latest
LIVE
LIVE
The Crypto Basic
--
"Ripple CEO Takes Aim at Gary Gensler and SEC, Declares ChatGPT Can Craft Superior Rules"Brad Garlinghouse continues to criticize SEC chair Gary Gensler over his unfavorable crypto regulation, as he suggests that the U.S. should leverage ChatGPT to get tips on how to regulate the industry. Read more on: https://thecryptobasic.com/2024/01/19/ripple-ceo-slams-gary-gensler-and-sec-says-chatgpt-can-make-better-rules/ #RippleVsSEC #SecGov #cryptocurrecny #cryptoleads #CryptoNewsLand

"Ripple CEO Takes Aim at Gary Gensler and SEC, Declares ChatGPT Can Craft Superior Rules"

Brad Garlinghouse continues to criticize SEC chair Gary Gensler over his unfavorable crypto regulation, as he suggests that the U.S. should leverage ChatGPT to get tips on how to regulate the industry.
Read more on: https://thecryptobasic.com/2024/01/19/ripple-ceo-slams-gary-gensler-and-sec-says-chatgpt-can-make-better-rules/
#RippleVsSEC #SecGov #cryptocurrecny #cryptoleads #CryptoNewsLand
"SEC Delays Verdict on Fidelity's Ethereum Spot ETF, Leaving Markets Hanging"The SEC has delayed its decision on Fidelityโ€™s proposed Ethereum spot ETF application, shifting the deadline from January 20 to March 5, 2024. Read more on: https://thecryptobasic.com/2024/01/19/sec-postpones-decision-on-fidelitys-ethereum-spot-etf/ #SecGov #spotETF #cryptocurrecny #cryptoleads #CryptonewswithJack

"SEC Delays Verdict on Fidelity's Ethereum Spot ETF, Leaving Markets Hanging"

The SEC has delayed its decision on Fidelityโ€™s proposed Ethereum spot ETF application, shifting the deadline from January 20 to March 5, 2024.
Read more on: https://thecryptobasic.com/2024/01/19/sec-postpones-decision-on-fidelitys-ethereum-spot-etf/
#SecGov #spotETF #cryptocurrecny #cryptoleads #CryptonewswithJack
๐Ÿšจ Update on Coinbase vs SEC Legal Battle ๐Ÿšจ The first round of oral arguments has concluded, and the judge, Katherine Polk Failla, is impressed with Coinbase's grasp of the complex issues. The DeFi community's amicus brief, praised by the judge, argued that Coinbase's staking doesn't qualify as an unregistered security. Judge Failla questioned the SEC's reliance on the Howey Test, citing crypto-supportive Senator Cynthia Lummis's perspective: "We've had 90 years where these securities laws have applied. But now we have something new." Coinbase contends the SEC's interpretation is too broad. The company's lawyer argued, "I think there would have been a lot of surprise in the 1933/1934 Congress to find an investment contract didnโ€™t have anything to do with a contract at all." Awaiting the judge's decision, legal experts suggest a 2 to 6-week timeframe. Will this case follow Ripple Labs' prolonged legal battle with the SEC? Stay tuned for updates! #CryptoNews. #Coinbase. #SecGov #trendingtoday
๐Ÿšจ Update on Coinbase vs SEC Legal Battle ๐Ÿšจ
The first round of oral arguments has concluded, and the judge, Katherine Polk Failla, is impressed with Coinbase's grasp of the complex issues. The DeFi community's amicus brief, praised by the judge, argued that Coinbase's staking doesn't qualify as an unregistered security.
Judge Failla questioned the SEC's reliance on the Howey Test, citing crypto-supportive Senator Cynthia Lummis's perspective: "We've had 90 years where these securities laws have applied. But now we have something new." Coinbase contends the SEC's interpretation is too broad.
The company's lawyer argued, "I think there would have been a lot of surprise in the 1933/1934 Congress to find an investment contract didnโ€™t have anything to do with a contract at all."
Awaiting the judge's decision, legal experts suggest a 2 to 6-week timeframe. Will this case follow Ripple Labs' prolonged legal battle with the SEC? Stay tuned for updates!
#CryptoNews. #Coinbase. #SecGov #trendingtoday
yes
89%
yes
11%
84 votes โ€ข Voting closed
LIVE
--
Bearish
๐Ÿ”” Binance Gears Up for Court Battle with SEC in High-Stakes Lawsuit ! Binance faces a lawsuit by the SEC, including allegations of trading volume inflation, customer fund misappropriation, and misleading investors. The exchange challenges the SEC's authority over crypto assets. CEO CZ's sentencing for anti-money laundering violations is set for February 23, 2024. The case follows a recent hearing involving Coinbase and the SEC. #BTC #SecGov #ETFsApproval
๐Ÿ”” Binance Gears Up for Court Battle with SEC in High-Stakes Lawsuit !

Binance faces a lawsuit by the SEC, including allegations of trading volume inflation, customer fund misappropriation, and misleading investors. The exchange challenges the SEC's authority over crypto assets. CEO CZ's sentencing for anti-money laundering violations is set for February 23, 2024. The case follows a recent hearing involving Coinbase and the SEC.
#BTC #SecGov #ETFsApproval
"Coinbase Takes SEC to Court: Alleges Arbitrary Actions and Lack of Clarity in Crypto Regulations"Coinbase, the US-based cryptocurrency exchange, has initiated legal action against the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), alleging that the regulatory body has acted arbitrarily and capriciously in refusing to adopt rules for clarifying oversight of the crypto industry. Coinbase asserts that the SEC has disregarded legal requirements in dismissing the company's formal rule-making petition for crypto regulations. The legal action, filed with the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, contends that the SEC claims authority over crypto assets while refusing to establish new rules for their treatment, and the agency did not provide a clear explanation for rejecting Coinbase's petition in December. According to Coinbase's legal representatives, the SEC's oversight of digital assets has been conducted through enforcement actions without a coherent framework. Gary Gensler, the SEC chairman, mentioned that the agency had been working on crypto rules, albeit not aligned with industry expectations, emphasizing the importance of maintaining discretion in setting rulemaking priorities. In response, Paul Grewal, Coinbase's legal officer, emphasized the lack of a clear reason for the SEC's inaction in the denial of the petition and stated that the public deserves an explanation and an opportunity to provide input. The legal dispute between Coinbase and the SEC is separate from the ongoing court battle over allegations of running an unregistered exchange listing unregistered crypto securities. Both cases highlight the SEC's reluctance to formally define crypto securities, leaving the industry in uncertainty. Coinbase's lawsuit aims to dismiss the SEC's previous disapproval and compel the agency to initiate new crypto rulemaking or provide a substantiated rationale for its position. The SEC has faced mixed outcomes in crypto-related court cases, experiencing defeats against Ripple and Grayscale but succeeding in an insider-trading case involving a former Coinbase employee. The industry closely watches these legal developments as they may shape the treatment of crypto exchanges under US securities law. The legal landscape is dynamic, with the potential for appeals and overturned decisions on the way to potential review by the US Supreme Court. #TrendingTopic #SecGov

"Coinbase Takes SEC to Court: Alleges Arbitrary Actions and Lack of Clarity in Crypto Regulations"

Coinbase, the US-based cryptocurrency exchange, has initiated legal action against the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), alleging that the regulatory body has acted arbitrarily and capriciously in refusing to adopt rules for clarifying oversight of the crypto industry. Coinbase asserts that the SEC has disregarded legal requirements in dismissing the company's formal rule-making petition for crypto regulations. The legal action, filed with the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, contends that the SEC claims authority over crypto assets while refusing to establish new rules for their treatment, and the agency did not provide a clear explanation for rejecting Coinbase's petition in December.
According to Coinbase's legal representatives, the SEC's oversight of digital assets has been conducted through enforcement actions without a coherent framework. Gary Gensler, the SEC chairman, mentioned that the agency had been working on crypto rules, albeit not aligned with industry expectations, emphasizing the importance of maintaining discretion in setting rulemaking priorities. In response, Paul Grewal, Coinbase's legal officer, emphasized the lack of a clear reason for the SEC's inaction in the denial of the petition and stated that the public deserves an explanation and an opportunity to provide input.
The legal dispute between Coinbase and the SEC is separate from the ongoing court battle over allegations of running an unregistered exchange listing unregistered crypto securities. Both cases highlight the SEC's reluctance to formally define crypto securities, leaving the industry in uncertainty. Coinbase's lawsuit aims to dismiss the SEC's previous disapproval and compel the agency to initiate new crypto rulemaking or provide a substantiated rationale for its position.
The SEC has faced mixed outcomes in crypto-related court cases, experiencing defeats against Ripple and Grayscale but succeeding in an insider-trading case involving a former Coinbase employee. The industry closely watches these legal developments as they may shape the treatment of crypto exchanges under US securities law. The legal landscape is dynamic, with the potential for appeals and overturned decisions on the way to potential review by the US Supreme Court.

#TrendingTopic #SecGov
LIVE
--
Bullish
๐Ÿšจ BREAKING: #SEC Chair Gary Gensler's statement on Spot #BitcoinETF approval. "We approved the listing and trading of certain spot bitcoin ETP shares today, but it's crucial to note that we did not endorse bitcoin." ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ #BTC #etf #SecGov $BTC
๐Ÿšจ BREAKING: #SEC Chair Gary Gensler's statement on Spot #BitcoinETF approval.

"We approved the listing and trading of certain spot bitcoin ETP shares today, but it's crucial to note that we did not endorse bitcoin." ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
#BTC #etf #SecGov $BTC
How do bitcoin etfs differ from investing in bitcoin directly? Indirect Investment: When investing in a Bitcoin ETF, you are not directly purchasing Bitcoin. Instead, you are buying shares in a fund that holds a certain amount of Bitcoin. This means that you do not have direct ownership of the cryptocurrency, and you cannot use the Bitcoin ETF as a currency or for other purposes. Trading Platform: Bitcoin ETFs are traded on traditional securities exchanges, such as the New York Stock Exchange, while Bitcoin itself is traded on cryptocurrency exchanges. This difference in trading platforms can impact the ease of trading and the availability of Bitcoin for different types of investors. Custody and Storage: The financial institution managing the Bitcoin ETF is responsible for purchasing, storing, and safekeeping the Bitcoin on behalf of the ETF's investors. In contrast, when investing in Bitcoin directly, you would need to manage your own private keys and wallets, which can be more complex and less secure than relying on a professional custodian. Regulation and Taxation: Bitcoin ETFs are subject to traditional securities regulations, while Bitcoin itself is governed by cryptocurrency regulations. This difference can impact the tax treatment of the investments and the way they are regulated by various authorities. Pricing and Fees: The value of a Bitcoin ETF share reflects the performance of Bitcoin, but the share's value may not track the underlying Bitcoin's price precisely. Additionally, Bitcoin ETFs may charge fees for management, custody, and other services, which can affect the overall return on investment. When investing directly in Bitcoin, you would only need to consider the transaction fees and other costs associated with buying and selling the cryptocurrency. In summary, while both Bitcoin ETFs and investing directly in Bitcoin provide exposure to the cryptocurrency's price movements, they differ in terms of indirect investment, trading platform, custody and storage, regulation and taxation, and pricing and fees. #BTC #ETFsApproval #SecGov
How do bitcoin etfs differ from investing in bitcoin directly?
Indirect Investment: When investing in a Bitcoin ETF, you are not directly purchasing Bitcoin. Instead, you are buying shares in a fund that holds a certain amount of Bitcoin.
This means that you do not have direct ownership of the cryptocurrency, and you cannot use the Bitcoin ETF as a currency or for other purposes.
Trading Platform: Bitcoin ETFs are traded on traditional securities exchanges, such as the New York Stock Exchange, while Bitcoin itself is traded on cryptocurrency exchanges.
This difference in trading platforms can impact the ease of trading and the availability of Bitcoin for different types of investors.
Custody and Storage: The financial institution managing the Bitcoin ETF is responsible for purchasing, storing, and safekeeping the Bitcoin on behalf of the ETF's investors.
In contrast, when investing in Bitcoin directly, you would need to manage your own private keys and wallets, which can be more complex and less secure than relying on a professional custodian.
Regulation and Taxation: Bitcoin ETFs are subject to traditional securities regulations, while Bitcoin itself is governed by cryptocurrency regulations.
This difference can impact the tax treatment of the investments and the way they are regulated by various authorities.
Pricing and Fees: The value of a Bitcoin ETF share reflects the performance of Bitcoin, but the share's value may not track the underlying Bitcoin's price precisely.
Additionally, Bitcoin ETFs may charge fees for management, custody, and other services, which can affect the overall return on investment.
When investing directly in Bitcoin, you would only need to consider the transaction fees and other costs associated with buying and selling the cryptocurrency.
In summary, while both Bitcoin ETFs and investing directly in Bitcoin provide exposure to the cryptocurrency's price movements, they differ in terms of indirect investment, trading platform, custody and storage, regulation and taxation, and pricing and fees.
#BTC #ETFsApproval #SecGov
ETF Approval announcement time zone from now to night 2pm expected ๐Ÿ”ฅ stay updated, keep learning keep earning, follow me for early news๐Ÿ“ I will try my best to guide you people, but I am not financial advisor on any trade or etc. ๐Ÿ“ #BTC #BTCETFSPOT #ETFbitcoin #ETFs. #SecGov #BTC
ETF Approval announcement time zone from now to night 2pm expected ๐Ÿ”ฅ stay updated, keep learning keep earning, follow me for early news๐Ÿ“ I will try my best to guide you people, but I am not financial advisor on any trade or etc. ๐Ÿ“ #BTC #BTCETFSPOT #ETFbitcoin #ETFs. #SecGov #BTC
Ripple v. SEC: Next Key Deadline to Watch in Crypto Legal Battle#Write2Earn Ripple and SEC have entered 'remedies' phase of lawsuitThe legal battle betweenย #RippleLabs ย and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is heating up as both parties prepare for the next key deadline in the case.As Ripple and the SEC enter the "remedies" phase of the case focusing on institutional sales, the upcomingย deadlineย in the case would be Feb. 20.Ripple scored a landmark win in the lawsuit in July 2023; however, the Court determined that certain $XRP institutional sales were investment contracts and hence should have been registered with the SEC.#XRPcommunity ย #SecGov ย v.ย Rippleย XRPย Rippleย requests a one-week extension of the deadline for remedies-related discovery, from February 12, 2024 to February 20, 2024.ย pic.twitter.com/xjIZQuY7jQโ€” James K. Filan ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช (@FilanLaw)ย February 6, 2024It should be recalled that earlier in February, Ripple requested a one-week extension of the deadline for remedies-related discovery from Feb. 12 to Feb. 20, making this the next crucial deadline in the legal battle.At this point, the discovery phase remains crucial, as it could reveal new information or arguments that could impact remedies.In a throwback to events that preceded this key timeline, the SEC served nine interrogatories and three RFPs on Ripple on Nov. 14.After the parties met and conferred on Dec. 21 and Jan. 3 to narrow the dispute, the SEC filed a motion on Jan. 11 to compel discovery of Ripple's financial statements for the years 2022 and 2023, post-complaint written contracts governing XRP sales to institutional buyers, hedge funds and ODL customers, and the proceeds Ripple received for deliveringย XRPย after the complaint was filed, but under written contracts entered into before.On Feb. 5, Judge Netburn granted the SEC's motion to compel in full. Following Judge Netburn's decision, Ripple stated that it would disclose available financial statements and serve a response to the SEC's interrogatory about post-complaint proceeds from pre-complaint contracts by the prior discovery deadline of Feb. 12, 2024.Ripple, however, sought a brief extension until Feb. 20 to produce its contracts for the sale of XRP to institutional buyers, hedge funds and ODL customers from a rough three-year period before, citing the difficulty associated with trying to collect and produce those documents by the previous deadline.Ripple did not request changes to any other deadlines in this case, with these remaining the same. Legal briefs are expected to be submitted in March and April of this year, and then the Court will decide which remedies to impose.#TrendingTopic

Ripple v. SEC: Next Key Deadline to Watch in Crypto Legal Battle

#Write2Earn Ripple and SEC have entered 'remedies' phase of lawsuitThe legal battle betweenย #RippleLabs ย and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is heating up as both parties prepare for the next key deadline in the case.As Ripple and the SEC enter the "remedies" phase of the case focusing on institutional sales, the upcomingย deadlineย in the case would be Feb. 20.Ripple scored a landmark win in the lawsuit in July 2023; however, the Court determined that certain $XRP institutional sales were investment contracts and hence should have been registered with the SEC.#XRPcommunity ย #SecGov ย v.ย Rippleย XRPย Rippleย requests a one-week extension of the deadline for remedies-related discovery, from February 12, 2024 to February 20, 2024.ย pic.twitter.com/xjIZQuY7jQโ€” James K. Filan ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช (@FilanLaw)ย February 6, 2024It should be recalled that earlier in February, Ripple requested a one-week extension of the deadline for remedies-related discovery from Feb. 12 to Feb. 20, making this the next crucial deadline in the legal battle.At this point, the discovery phase remains crucial, as it could reveal new information or arguments that could impact remedies.In a throwback to events that preceded this key timeline, the SEC served nine interrogatories and three RFPs on Ripple on Nov. 14.After the parties met and conferred on Dec. 21 and Jan. 3 to narrow the dispute, the SEC filed a motion on Jan. 11 to compel discovery of Ripple's financial statements for the years 2022 and 2023, post-complaint written contracts governing XRP sales to institutional buyers, hedge funds and ODL customers, and the proceeds Ripple received for deliveringย XRPย after the complaint was filed, but under written contracts entered into before.On Feb. 5, Judge Netburn granted the SEC's motion to compel in full. Following Judge Netburn's decision, Ripple stated that it would disclose available financial statements and serve a response to the SEC's interrogatory about post-complaint proceeds from pre-complaint contracts by the prior discovery deadline of Feb. 12, 2024.Ripple, however, sought a brief extension until Feb. 20 to produce its contracts for the sale of XRP to institutional buyers, hedge funds and ODL customers from a rough three-year period before, citing the difficulty associated with trying to collect and produce those documents by the previous deadline.Ripple did not request changes to any other deadlines in this case, with these remaining the same. Legal briefs are expected to be submitted in March and April of this year, and then the Court will decide which remedies to impose.#TrendingTopic
- ๐™๐™๐™š ๐™๐™Ž ๐™Ž๐™š๐™˜๐™ช๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™š๐™จ ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™™ ๐™€๐™ญ๐™˜๐™๐™–๐™ฃ๐™œ๐™š ๐˜พ๐™ค๐™ข๐™ข๐™ž๐™จ๐™จ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ (๐™Ž๐™€๐˜พ) ๐™ž๐™จ ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™ซ๐™š๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™œ๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐™Š๐™ฅ๐™š๐™ฃ๐˜ผ๐™„'๐™จ ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ง๐™ฃ๐™–๐™ก ๐™™๐™ค๐™˜๐™ช๐™ข๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™จ. - ๐™๐™๐™š ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™ซ๐™š๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™œ๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™ž๐™จ ๐™›๐™ค๐™˜๐™ช๐™จ๐™š๐™™ ๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™ฌ๐™๐™š๐™ฉ๐™๐™š๐™ง ๐™Š๐™ฅ๐™š๐™ฃ๐˜ผ๐™„ ๐™ข๐™ž๐™จ๐™ก๐™š๐™™ ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™ซ๐™š๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™ค๐™ง๐™จ. - ๐™๐™๐™š ๐™Ž๐™€๐˜พ'๐™จ ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ง๐™š๐™จ๐™ฉ ๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ข๐™จ ๐™›๐™ง๐™ค๐™ข ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™จ๐™ช๐™™๐™™๐™š๐™ฃ ๐™™๐™ž๐™จ๐™ข๐™ž๐™จ๐™จ๐™–๐™ก ๐™ค๐™› ๐˜พ๐™€๐™Š ๐™Ž๐™–๐™ข ๐˜ผ๐™ก๐™ฉ๐™ข๐™–๐™ฃ ๐™—๐™ฎ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™Š๐™ฅ๐™š๐™ฃ๐˜ผ๐™„ ๐™—๐™ค๐™–๐™ง๐™™ ๐™ž๐™ฃ ๐™‰๐™ค๐™ซ๐™š๐™ข๐™—๐™š๐™ง. - ๐™Š๐™ฅ๐™š๐™ฃ๐˜ผ๐™„ ๐™–๐™˜๐™˜๐™ช๐™จ๐™š๐™™ ๐˜ผ๐™ก๐™ฉ๐™ข๐™–๐™ฃ ๐™ค๐™› ๐™– ๐™ก๐™–๐™˜๐™  ๐™ค๐™› ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™จ๐™ž๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ฉ ๐™๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™š๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™ฎ ๐™ž๐™ฃ ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ข๐™ข๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™ž๐™˜๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ. - ๐™๐™๐™š ๐™—๐™ค๐™–๐™ง๐™™ ๐™๐™–๐™™ ๐™ฅ๐™ง๐™š๐™ซ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ช๐™จ๐™ก๐™ฎ ๐™š๐™ญ๐™ฅ๐™ง๐™š๐™จ๐™จ๐™š๐™™ ๐™– ๐™ก๐™ค๐™จ๐™จ ๐™ค๐™› ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™›๐™ž๐™™๐™š๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™š ๐™ž๐™ฃ ๐˜ผ๐™ก๐™ฉ๐™ข๐™–๐™ฃ'๐™จ ๐™–๐™—๐™ž๐™ก๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ฎ ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™ก๐™š๐™–๐™™ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ข๐™ฅ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™ฎ. - ๐™Š๐™ฅ๐™š๐™ฃ๐˜ผ๐™„ ๐™˜๐™ค-๐™›๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™™๐™š๐™ง ๐™‚๐™ง๐™š๐™œ ๐˜ฝ๐™ง๐™ค๐™˜๐™ ๐™ข๐™–๐™ฃ ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™ฃ๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™š๐™™ ๐™๐™ž๐™จ ๐™™๐™š๐™ฅ๐™–๐™ง๐™ฉ๐™ช๐™ง๐™š ๐™›๐™ง๐™ค๐™ข ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ข๐™ฅ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™ฎ ๐™›๐™ค๐™ก๐™ก๐™ค๐™ฌ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐˜ผ๐™ก๐™ฉ๐™ข๐™–๐™ฃ'๐™จ ๐™™๐™ž๐™จ๐™ข๐™ž๐™จ๐™จ๐™–๐™ก. #SecGov #OpenAI #cryptonews
- ๐™๐™๐™š ๐™๐™Ž ๐™Ž๐™š๐™˜๐™ช๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™š๐™จ ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™™ ๐™€๐™ญ๐™˜๐™๐™–๐™ฃ๐™œ๐™š ๐˜พ๐™ค๐™ข๐™ข๐™ž๐™จ๐™จ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ (๐™Ž๐™€๐˜พ) ๐™ž๐™จ ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™ซ๐™š๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™œ๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐™Š๐™ฅ๐™š๐™ฃ๐˜ผ๐™„'๐™จ ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ง๐™ฃ๐™–๐™ก ๐™™๐™ค๐™˜๐™ช๐™ข๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™จ.
- ๐™๐™๐™š ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™ซ๐™š๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™œ๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™ž๐™จ ๐™›๐™ค๐™˜๐™ช๐™จ๐™š๐™™ ๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™ฌ๐™๐™š๐™ฉ๐™๐™š๐™ง ๐™Š๐™ฅ๐™š๐™ฃ๐˜ผ๐™„ ๐™ข๐™ž๐™จ๐™ก๐™š๐™™ ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™ซ๐™š๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™ค๐™ง๐™จ.

- ๐™๐™๐™š ๐™Ž๐™€๐˜พ'๐™จ ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ง๐™š๐™จ๐™ฉ ๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ข๐™จ ๐™›๐™ง๐™ค๐™ข ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™จ๐™ช๐™™๐™™๐™š๐™ฃ ๐™™๐™ž๐™จ๐™ข๐™ž๐™จ๐™จ๐™–๐™ก ๐™ค๐™› ๐˜พ๐™€๐™Š ๐™Ž๐™–๐™ข ๐˜ผ๐™ก๐™ฉ๐™ข๐™–๐™ฃ ๐™—๐™ฎ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™Š๐™ฅ๐™š๐™ฃ๐˜ผ๐™„ ๐™—๐™ค๐™–๐™ง๐™™ ๐™ž๐™ฃ ๐™‰๐™ค๐™ซ๐™š๐™ข๐™—๐™š๐™ง.
- ๐™Š๐™ฅ๐™š๐™ฃ๐˜ผ๐™„ ๐™–๐™˜๐™˜๐™ช๐™จ๐™š๐™™ ๐˜ผ๐™ก๐™ฉ๐™ข๐™–๐™ฃ ๐™ค๐™› ๐™– ๐™ก๐™–๐™˜๐™  ๐™ค๐™› ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™จ๐™ž๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ฉ ๐™๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™š๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™ฎ ๐™ž๐™ฃ ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ข๐™ข๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™ž๐™˜๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ.

- ๐™๐™๐™š ๐™—๐™ค๐™–๐™ง๐™™ ๐™๐™–๐™™ ๐™ฅ๐™ง๐™š๐™ซ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ช๐™จ๐™ก๐™ฎ ๐™š๐™ญ๐™ฅ๐™ง๐™š๐™จ๐™จ๐™š๐™™ ๐™– ๐™ก๐™ค๐™จ๐™จ ๐™ค๐™› ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™›๐™ž๐™™๐™š๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™š ๐™ž๐™ฃ ๐˜ผ๐™ก๐™ฉ๐™ข๐™–๐™ฃ'๐™จ ๐™–๐™—๐™ž๐™ก๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ฎ ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™ก๐™š๐™–๐™™ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ข๐™ฅ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™ฎ.

- ๐™Š๐™ฅ๐™š๐™ฃ๐˜ผ๐™„ ๐™˜๐™ค-๐™›๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™™๐™š๐™ง ๐™‚๐™ง๐™š๐™œ ๐˜ฝ๐™ง๐™ค๐™˜๐™ ๐™ข๐™–๐™ฃ ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™ฃ๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™š๐™™ ๐™๐™ž๐™จ ๐™™๐™š๐™ฅ๐™–๐™ง๐™ฉ๐™ช๐™ง๐™š ๐™›๐™ง๐™ค๐™ข ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™˜๐™ค๐™ข๐™ฅ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™ฎ ๐™›๐™ค๐™ก๐™ก๐™ค๐™ฌ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐˜ผ๐™ก๐™ฉ๐™ข๐™–๐™ฃ'๐™จ ๐™™๐™ž๐™จ๐™ข๐™ž๐™จ๐™จ๐™–๐™ก.

#SecGov #OpenAI #cryptonews
U.S. Senators urge SEC not to approve more crypto ETFs, citing risks of fraud and manipulation to investors In a joint statement, Senators Jack Reed and Laphonza Butler express concerns about the potential harm crypto ETFs could pose to retail investors due to fraud and market manipulation risks. They stress the nascent nature of cryptocurrency markets and call for caution, highlighting the lack of regulation and transparency compared to traditional financial markets. Their appeal to the SEC reflects broader apprehension among lawmakers regarding crypto assets' intersection with mainstream financial products. It aligns with the SEC's recent efforts to establish a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies and echoes concerns about market manipulation and investor protection voiced by other government officials and financial experts. While the SEC has approved some crypto-related ETFs, direct holdings of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin remain unapproved. The senators' statement underscores the ongoing debate over cryptocurrency regulation and its impact on the financial system, posing a significant challenge for policymakers and regulatory bodies. As the SEC evaluates the senators' request, the fate of crypto ETFs and their potential implications for the cryptocurrency market and retail investors remain uncertain. #HotTrends #Trendingtopics #SecGov #ETFs
U.S. Senators urge SEC not to approve more crypto ETFs, citing risks of fraud and manipulation to investors

In a joint statement, Senators Jack Reed and Laphonza Butler express concerns about the potential harm crypto ETFs could pose to retail investors due to fraud and market manipulation risks. They stress the nascent nature of cryptocurrency markets and call for caution, highlighting the lack of regulation and transparency compared to traditional financial markets.

Their appeal to the SEC reflects broader apprehension among lawmakers regarding crypto assets' intersection with mainstream financial products. It aligns with the SEC's recent efforts to establish a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies and echoes concerns about market manipulation and investor protection voiced by other government officials and financial experts.

While the SEC has approved some crypto-related ETFs, direct holdings of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin remain unapproved. The senators' statement underscores the ongoing debate over cryptocurrency regulation and its impact on the financial system, posing a significant challenge for policymakers and regulatory bodies.

As the SEC evaluates the senators' request, the fate of crypto ETFs and their potential implications for the cryptocurrency market and retail investors remain uncertain.

#HotTrends #Trendingtopics #SecGov #ETFs
LIVE
--
Bullish
LIVE
NFTSHITZ
--
๐ŸšจSEC approves 11 spot bitcoin ETFs, with trading likely set to start tomorrow
Quick TakeThe SEC said it has approved proposals for 11 spot bitcoin ETFsTrading is likely to start tomorrow.The Securities and Exchange Commission said it has approved proposals for 11 spot bitcoin ETFs on an accelerated basis, in a document that was uploaded to the SEC website.The document lists 11 spot bitcoin ETFs by Bitwise, Grayscale, Hashdex, BlackRock, Valkyrie, BZX, Invesco, VanEck, WisdomTree, Fidelity and Franklin."After careful review, the Commission finds that the Proposals are consistent with the Exchange Act and rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange," the document states.The document notes that fraud or manipulation that would impact prices in spot bitcoin markets would likely impact bitcoin futures prices in similar ways. This is a nod to the recent court case that found the SEC acted in an "arbitrary and capricious" manner when rejecting Grayscale's earlier bid to pivot GBTC to an ETF.โ€œI am happy to confirm that the Grayscale team has received necessary regulatory approvals to uplist GBTC to NYSE Arca, and we will share a press release with additional information shortly,โ€ said a Grayscale spokesperson.After the document was first picked up, it quickly went to a 404 error. A short while later it appeared in the correct part of the SEC website and the SEC told The Block that the filing was accurate.Alongside the omnibus approval order, the SEC published a speech by Chair Gary Gensler. He confirmed the approvals but added a warning. "While we approved the listing and trading of certain spot bitcoin ETP shares today, we did not approve or endorse bitcoin. Investors should remain cautious about the myriad risks associated with bitcoin and products whose value is tied to crypto," he said.While the document approves the issuers' 19b-4 forms all in one go, they will still need their S-1 forms to be effective for trading to start.Earlier today, the Cboe BZX exchange sent letters to the Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday, requesting โ€œacceleration of registrationโ€ for proposed spot bitcoin ETFs. A few hours later, it issued listing notifications for six prospective ETFs saying that trading would begin on Thursday. This was prior to any approvals by the SEC.Potential inflowsOnce trading gets underway, these products could see large inflows. Valkyrie Investments co-founder and CIO Steven McClurg said he expects $200 million to $400 million of investorsโ€™ funds coming to Valkyrieโ€™s ETF, and all participants might see $4 to $5 billion of inflows over the first couple of weeks.VanEck estimated that $1 billion of funds would arrive in the first few days, and $2.4 billion within a quarter. Galaxy expects $14 billion within the first year. Bitwise said it anticipated the market for spot bitcoin ETFs to reach around $72 billion within five years.ย On Tuesday, the SECโ€™s X account was compromised and a post went out claiming the SEC had granted approval for listing bitcoin ETFs on all registered securities exchanges with an image showing a quote by SEC Chair Gary Gensler. It was shortly deleted with follow up posts claiming it was unauthorized and that spot bitcoin ETFs had not been approved by that point.Preparing for spot bitcoin ETFsThe issuers have also lined up seed funding for their products. VanEck has taken the lead with direct investment, noting that it has seeded its potential spot bitcoin ETF with $72.5 million. Bitwise has seeded its proposed ETF with $500,000, according to its amended S-1 form, but Pantera Capital has also said that it is interested in putting $200 million into the fund if approved. BlackRock has seeded its potential spot bitcoin ETF with $10 million.Prior to approval, the ETF applicants had been waging a war for who can offer the lowest fees. Bitwise went the lowest, with zero fees for the first six months or until $1 billion of assets, and 0.2% afterward โ€” which it lowered from 0.24% just days before. BlackRock maintained its offering of a discounted 0.2% for the first 12 months or until the fund hits $5 billion in assets, and 0.3% from then on. Other fees range up to 1.5% at the highest.๐Ÿ™๐ŸฟShow Your Support๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ™๐ŸฟIf you found this helpful, consider to tipping me through the Binance Tipping feature. Your generosity will help me to continue to provide high quality contents. ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿฟ#SecGov #ETFApprovalDreams #ETFsApproval #etf #SECApprovalJourney
Explore the lastest crypto news
โšก๏ธ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto
๐Ÿ’ฌ Interact with your favorite creators
๐Ÿ‘ Enjoy content that interests you
Email / Phone number