If you were to begin anew, would $LUNC still be your choice? Contemplating this question prompts us to revisit a pivotal juncture two and a half years back when $LUNC witnessed a fall from its former glory.
Would you persist in supporting $LUNC at that moment, or would you opt to explore the chance to acquire $BTC within the realms of the red building?
This query resonates significantly.
The absence of $LUNC could have potentially denied some individuals the opportunity to partake in the closed-loop system. Hence, if granted the opportunity, I surmise that many would still find themselves present on that specific day in May from two years ago.
Perceiving it as a static fee renders entry relatively hassle-free. However, should your intention be to harness it for wealth generation, a robust strategy indeed exists.
Although I have pinpointed this strategy, its execution by others remains lacking.
So, who plays a pivotal role in this equation? The key lies in instigating a recurrent burning plan utilizing the $DFC platform. Continual marketing efforts, acquisition of $USTC through burning and transaction fees—primarily reimbursed—and active investor participation in the burning process collectively drive this approach. With time, under the diminishing mechanism of DFC, the price is naturally poised to ascend, culminating in a substantial augmentation of capital. Can you fully appreciate the potential inherent in this promising opportunity?