Hi! Imagine that you lost your cryptocurrency due to scammers, and the exchange or service is obligated to refund your money. The United States is currently discussing a law that can make this a reality. Let's figure out how this can work.
What is offered?
The U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) wants crypto services to become more responsible to their customers. They proposed to include cryptocurrency accounts in the operation of the Electronic Funds Transfer Act (EFTA). This law protects bank account holders from errors and fraudulent transactions. Now it can be expanded to cover cryptocurrencies as well.
What will change?
Here are the key points:
Crypta = money.
They propose to consider cryptocurrencies as "funds", like dollars. This includes bitcoins, stablecoins, and other digital assets.
Responsibilities of providers.
Companies working with cryptocurrency will be required to:
To compensate money for unauthorized transactions.
Disclose all fees, limits, and rules.
Report any changes to the terms.
Uniform safety standards.
Providers will be required to follow the same rules as banks: to prevent mistakes, prevent fraud, and protect users.
Why is this important?
Nowadays, in the crypto industry, the responsibility for security often lies solely with the user. If you lost access to your wallet or fell for the tricks of scammers, that's your problem. And if this rule is adopted, users will be more protected, especially those who store assets on centralized exchanges.
For example, in 2024, victims of hacker attacks lost about $3 billion. The new rule may reduce such risks.
But there are also problems.
Experts say the proposal raises questions.:
Non-custodial wallets.
The new rule does not seem to apply to wallets where the user manages their own keys, like MetaMask. This leaves most of the crypto market out of the regulatory zone.
Difficulties with implementation.
The blockchain works on the principle of irreversibility. How can I refund the user if the transaction has already taken place?
The risk of pressure on the industry.
Strict regulation can scare away crypto companies, and they will start leaving the United States for other countries.
What do the experts say?
Jai Massari (Lightspark): Points out that the rule leaves too many uncertainties, especially for developers and users of non-custodial wallets.
Drew Hinkes (lawyer): He believes that simply transferring banking laws to crypto is a simplistic approach that may not work.
Bill Hughes (Consensys): warns that excessive regulation may become a problem for the development of the industry.
What's next?
Right now it's just a suggestion. The CFPB collects public opinions until March 31, and then decides whether to introduce a rule or not. If it is accepted, crypto platforms in the United States will have to rebuild their processes.
What does this mean for us?
If you store crypto on centralized exchanges such as Binance or Coinbase, this rule may give you more protection. But if you use non-custodial wallets, the responsibility for security will remain with you.
In any case, it shows that the crypto market is becoming more mature, and the government is trying to regulate it. The only question is whether these rules will be useful or create new problems.
What do you think?
#crypto #scammers