After purchasing bitcoin on a few occasions during the 2021 bull run, El Salvador began dollar-cost-averaging into the top cryptocurrency in November 2022, and was in the black on its holdings by December 2023, according to Bukele. El Salvador’s bitcoin strategy has been a constant sticking point with the International Monetary Fund, which has raised concerns about the nation’s fiscal situation.

Source link

<p>The post Bitcoin Price (BTC) Rally Sends Bhutan Holdings Above $1B, Bukele’s El Salvador’s Above $500M first appeared on CoinBuzzFeed.</p>

The post Crypto Market Cap Hits $3.1 Trillion! appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

The crypto market capitalization has reportedly achieved a new all-time high (ATH) of $3.12 Trillion. Notably, on 11th November, the total crypto market cap experienced a jump of 7% in 24 hours. The prime reason for this surge was due to a sudden spike in the Bitcoin price. Notably, with a 24-hour jump of 9.41%, BTC price has achieved the $89,500 mark. With this, the market cap of Bitcoin alone is now over $1.77 trillion. According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), this accounts for more than Spain’s GDP. Notably, the last time the total cryptocurrency market capitalization was above the $3 trillion mark was on 15th November 2021. This was when Bitcoin reached its previous ATH of $69,000 during the 2020-2021 bull run.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) recently sparked discussions on Bitcoin’s growing influence on global finance. As cryptocurrencies continue to carve out their roles in global economics, the IMF highlighted Bitcoin’s potential in their report ‘A Primer on Bitcoin Cross-Border Flows’. This analysis comes at a time when cryptocurrency usage is making headway in economies worldwide.

Source: IMF Bitcoin’s Role in Economic Independence

According to the IMF, Bitcoin holds the key to financial autonomy for many countries currently hindered by challenging economic conditions. The report elaborates on Bitcoin’s emergent importance in the financial realm, suggesting that the cryptocurrency could serve as a linchpin for countries striving to stabilize and grow their economies independently.

Over the past year, the finance industry has undergone extensive digitization, a transformation that Bitcoin has been central to. Nations around the globe are increasingly integrating cryptocurrencies into their economic strategies, viewing them as essential tools for fostering economic resilience and diversification.

Amid these shifts, Bitcoin’s relevance has only soared, particularly as geopolitical tensions heighten the appeal of decentralized and non-sovereign assets like Bitcoin and gold. The IMF’s observations point to Bitcoin’s potential to act as a hedge against financial instability, underscoring its suitability for countries looking to diversify their economic strategies away from traditional financial systems.

Analyzing Bitcoin’s Cross-Border Flows

The IMF report delves into the mechanics of Bitcoin’s cross-border utilization, drawing on comprehensive data that spans both on-chain transactions (recorded on the Bitcoin blockchain) and off-chain transactions (not recorded on the Bitcoin blockchain). The analysis reveals distinct patterns in how Bitcoin behaves compared to traditional capital flows, particularly in how these flows react to global economic drivers.

One notable finding is that Bitcoin cross-border flows are not driven by the same factors that influence traditional capital flows. For instance, while traditional inflows might falter during broad dollar appreciation events, Bitcoin transactions tend to increase, possibly due to its appeal as a risk aversion tool, which is heightened during volatile market conditions as indicated by the VIX—a popular measure of stock market volatility.

Additionally, the report highlights the sizable impact of Bitcoin transactions on the GDPs of several countries, emphasizing its significance not just in terms of economic strategy but also in its potential to support regions with limited access to conventional capital flows.

Differences in On-Chain and Off-Chain Dynamics

The IMF’s analysis further distinguishes between on-chain and off-chain Bitcoin flows, noting that on-chain transactions generally involve larger amounts and are influenced majorly by the blockchain’s security features and fee structures. Meanwhile, off-chain flows often relate to efforts to circumvent capital control measures, suggesting a tactical use of Bitcoin to bypass geopolitical and economic restrictions.

This segmentation reveals the heterogeneous nature of Bitcoin’s utility across different global regions and market conditions. It also underscores the complexity of tracking and understanding Bitcoin’s full impact on global finance, given the decentralized and semi-anonymous nature of its transactions.

Further examination by the IMF shows that while Bitcoin flows respond to changes in market sentiment and macroeconomic indicators, they do so in ways that often diverge from traditional financial assets. This not only challenges conventional financial theories but also highlights Bitcoin’s unique position in the financial ecosystem.

The corridors of global finance were abuzz as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) threw its weight behind the notion of delayed interest rate cuts in the U.S., striking a delicate balance between caution and necessity. Kristalina Georgieva, the IMF’s head honcho, tipped the scales against a hasty easing of monetary policy, advocating instead for a data-driven approach in the face of inflationary ghosts and economic uncertainties. This stance comes amid speculative fervor over the Federal Reserve’s next moves, following Jerome Powell’s hints that the era of aggressive tightening might be taking a breather.

The Fine Line Between Too Soon and Too Late

The IMF’s cautionary tale reads like a financial thriller, where the protagonist, the Federal Reserve, navigates the tightrope of monetary policy with the poise of a seasoned acrobat. The crux of the matter? Moving too quickly to slash interest rates could unravel the hard-won battles against inflation, sending markets into a tailspin of expectation versus reality. On the flip side, clutching too tightly to high rates risks stifling U.S. economic growth and sending shockwaves through emerging markets, already teetering on the edge of financial equilibrium.

In this high-stakes environment, the IMF’s Georgieva is the voice of reason, urging the Fed to keep its eyes on the data dashboard and steer clear of the market’s exuberant daydreams. The narrative thickens as the Fed’s benchmark rate hovers at a 22-year zenith, with market odds for a March rate cut taking a nosedive post-Powell’s reality check. This plot twist sees financial soothsayers from Goldman Sachs to Barclays recalibrating their crystal balls, pushing back their rate cut forecasts and hanging on every word from the Fed’s camp.

A Balancing Act of Economic Proportions for the U.S.

The stage is set against a backdrop of cooling inflation and resilient unemployment figures, painting a picture of an economy that’s dodging bullets like a scene from an action movie. Yet, this apparent tranquility masks the undercurrents of real interest rates rising, potentially applying the brakes on economic activity just as the U.S. seemed to be hitting its stride. The Fed’s Powell, in a move that’s part chess master, part Zen monk, remains unflappable. He acknowledges the risks but suggests the Fed’s narrative is one of cautious optimism, underscored by a wait-and-see approach that leans heavily on the continuation of positive data trends.

However, the recent surge in U.S. job growth and wage acceleration throws a spanner in the works, hinting that the road to interest rate cuts might be more marathon than sprint. This latest economic plot twist has traders recalibrating their bets on the timing and extent of Fed rate cuts, with the market’s expectations for a softer policy stance by year-end showing signs of waning confidence.

In this financial saga, the IMF’s backing of a measured approach to U.S. interest rate cuts emerges as a cornerstone of a broader strategy aimed at nurturing economic recovery while keeping inflationary dragons at bay. The narrative weaves together the threads of monetary policy, economic indicators, and market psychology, crafting a tapestry that reflects the complexities of steering the U.S. economy through uncharted waters.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is not known for mincing words, and its recent commentary on Europe is no exception. Gita Gopinath, the IMF’s Deputy Managing Director, delivered a candid assessment of Europe’s economic position in a global context that is increasingly fragmented.

The message was clear during an event in Berlin, which is that Europe needs to adapt and act swiftly in an evolving economic landscape.

Europe’s Unique Position and the IMF’s Concern

Europe stands at a crossroads, more open than other major economic regions and uniquely composed of nations excelling in innovation and manufacturing. This openness, while a strength, also makes Europe vulnerable in a world where global trade is becoming more regionally focused.

Gopinath underscored this in her speech, highlighting that while global trade maintains a steady pace, it masks the reality of increasing trade within politically aligned blocs, as opposed to between them.

The IMF’s research suggests that Europe could benefit significantly from this trend, with deeper integration within the EU potentially boosting its GDP by 7%. This is not just a number; it’s comparable to the cost the IMF estimates would incur from severe global fragmentation.

If the world is heading towards regionalized globalization, Europe, with its mix of economies, could navigate these changes effectively. But this requires more than just passive observation; it demands proactive measures.

IMF’s Bold Recommendations for the EU

The IMF isn’t just diagnosing problems; it’s prescribing solutions. Gopinath’s speech laid out ambitious recommendations for the EU that go beyond what its leaders currently seem prepared to pursue.

There’s a call for better harmonization of taxes and subsidies across EU countries, which would encourage investment in cross-border infrastructure and discourage competitive discrepancies in state aid.

A critical piece of the IMF’s advice focuses on completing the capital markets union and banking union. This isn’t just about regulatory tidying up; it’s about mobilizing adequate funding for the EU’s substantial climate and digital investment needs. The aim? To keep Europe competitive and at the forefront of technology.

Furthermore, the IMF argues for setting decarbonization targets at the EU level, rather than individually by member states. This approach ensures that efforts are concentrated where they are most cost-effective across the EU.

To finance these interventions in areas like renewable energy and smart grids, an EU-wide central fiscal capacity is proposed – a measure to ensure that resources flow where they yield the highest benefits, and not just where governments can afford to provide state aid.

Gopinath emphasized the importance of not being overly optimistic about recent positive data on inflation and noted the tight labor markets in both the U.S. and Europe.

With Europe experiencing slower growth than the U.S., the concern is whether monetary policy may be too tight for too long, risking an increase in unemployment rates.

Addressing the need for substantial investment, particularly in climate transition and digital transformation, Gopinath pointed out the necessity for countries to balance their spending ambitions with their revenue capabilities.

This includes exploring new sources of revenue, such as implementing a global corporate minimum tax and addressing loopholes in capital gains and property taxes. The message is clear: Europe needs to be pragmatic and proactive in its fiscal management.

The IMF’s message to Europe is a wake-up call. It’s not just about weathering the storm of global economic shifts; it’s about actively shaping a resilient and prosperous future.

The IMF’s recommendations, if heeded, could propel Europe to a position of strength in a fragmented global economy.

However, this requires bold action and a willingness to embrace challenging reforms. As Europe navigates these turbulent waters, the choices it makes now will determine its economic trajectory for years to come.

In recent years, Singapore has stood out among nations for its proactive measures to attract web3 companies and foster innovation in the cryptocurrency sector. Recently, During the opening speech at the Singapore FinTech Festival, Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Kristalina Georgieva, stressed the potential of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) to replace physical money, especially in economies where cash deployment is costly. 

IMF managing director advocates CBDCs at the Singapore FinTech festival

CBDCs are digital versions of sovereign currencies, such as the U.S. dollar or the euro, issued by central banks. They leverage technologies associated with cryptocurrencies and are seen by governments globally as tools to support payment digitization, enhance cross-border payment efficiency, and promote financial inclusion for unbanked or underbanked populations. Ethereum is the best blockchain for Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) because it’s highly scalable and prioritizes privacy.

Also Read: Hong Kong’s e-HKD CBDC pilot program advances to phase-2

However, Georgieva highlighted several benefits of CBDC adoption, stating,

“CBDCs can replace cash, which is costly to distribute in island economies. They can offer resilience in more advanced economies. And they can improve financial inclusion where few hold bank accounts.”

While acknowledging the current uncertainty and low adoption rates of CBDCs, Georgieva urged the public sector to continue preparations for their deployment and related payment platforms. She also highlighted the importance of designing these platforms to facilitate cross-border payments, addressing the current challenges of being expensive, slow, and accessible to only a few.

CBDCs fuel global access and cross-border efficiency

Despite calls from financial institutions like the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) to establish relevant legislation supporting CBDCs, major jurisdictions have yet to make definitive decisions on their issuance. Georgieva echoed BIS Chief Agustin Carstens’ recent comments, underscoring that CBDCs will play a central role in financial innovation, with the private sector expected to contribute significantly to bringing these digital currencies to market.

Recently, on October 17, 2023, the assistant governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia made a statement that the Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) is the future of finance. The evolving landscape of digital currencies remains a focal point, with CBDCs emerging as a potential game-changer in reshaping the future of money. 

The post CBDCs can replace cash, says International Monetary Fund’s MD appeared first on Todayq News.