"Why do I feel like it's going to dump?!" $RVN #RVN | Emperorㅤ på Binance Square

Populære artikler

Bogmærke og Synes godt om

Center for skabere

--

Bearish

"Why do I feel like it's going to dump?!"$RVN #RVN 

0 personer gav drikkepenge til skaberen.

Ansvarsfraskrivelse: Indeholder holdninger fra tredjepart. Ikke økonomisk rådgivning. Kan indeholde sponsoreret indhold. Se vilkår og betingelser.

RVN

0

%

1.3k

0

Udforsk de seneste kryptonyheder

⚡️ Vær en del af de seneste debatter inden for krypto

💬 Interager med dine yndlingsskabere

👍 Nyd indhold, der interesserer dig

E-mail/telefonnummer

Relevant skaber

@JohnCarl

Udforsk mere fra skaberen

Mantra’s $OM token crashed over 90% in hours—from $6.30 to $0.43—wiping out billions and triggering panic. Some are calling it “the next LUNC,” but the reality is more complicated. The crash was likely caused by forced liquidations from a large investor on CEXs like OKX, where over $36M in OM was moved just before the drop. CEO John Mullin blamed reckless sell pressure and denied any team dumping, claiming their tokens remain untouched and verifiable on-chain. Social media fueled fears, accusing the team of dumping 3.9M OM. Meanwhile, last month’s airdrop controversy—where over 50% of users were blacklisted—further eroded community trust. Add in bearish signals like March’s 20% drop and a looming death cross, and the crash appears to be the result of internal tension, weak liquidity, and sentiment panic, not necessarily a protocol failure like LUNC. Unlike LUNC, which collapsed due to a failed stablecoin system, OM is tied to real-world asset tokenization with backing from partners like DAMAC and a Dubai VARA license. The team is still active and addressing concerns, but the lack of community momentum, major backing, and ongoing suspicion over token control leaves recovery uncertain. OM isn’t dead, but it's at a critical point. If the team can regain trust and deliver on its promises, a rebound is possible. For now, it’s a warning—not a repeat—of $LUNC . #om #mantra

--

$ORCA Traders Are Bleeding and Don’t Even Know It – Here’s Why Funding Fees Are Draining You!! If you’re trading #ORCAUSDT , this is your wake-up call. The funding rate is deeply negative—over -10.84% APR, which means shorts are paying longs, not the other way around. But here’s the twist: despite shorts paying funding, the market remains heavy, with long/short ratios crashing, low taker buy volume, and a declining basis showing futures prices falling below the index. This means bearish sentiment is dominating, and even with shorts paying the fee, the price action favors downside. In simple terms: the market is overloaded with longs trying to bottom-pick, but price action says otherwise. Funding fees alone don’t guarantee profit—if you're long and the market keeps dipping, your PnL still bleeds. Always track funding rate, volume, and basis before entering a position blindly. #ORCA #BinanceSafetyInsights

--

Terra Luna Classic burned 408 billion tokens—yet it’s still miles away from recovery. Can it ever return to its $116 glory? The numbers say no, but here’s exactly why, broken down in plain language. The LUNC community is trying hard to reduce supply by burning tokens—over 408 billion so far, with Binance helping a lot. But even at this pace, it would take around 7 years just to shrink the supply to 10 billion. And even if that happens, for LUNC to reach $116 again, the total market cap would need to be over $1 trillion—more than any crypto has ever achieved except Bitcoin. Right now, $LUNC trades at less than a cent. Its old price was tied to a stablecoin (UST), which no longer exists. That means the economic engine that powered LUNC’s price before the crash is gone. Even though developers are improving the network and burning tokens, the demand isn't growing fast enough to support a big price jump. There’s still community support and upgrades happening, and prices might rise slowly, maybe up to $0.0001 or even $0.001 during a crypto bull run. But getting back to $116? That would require burning more than 99.9% of all tokens and somehow getting investors to pour in trillions of dollars—highly unrealistic. So, while #LUNC isn’t dead, and there's still potential for gains, it won’t return to its all-time high. Knowing the facts can help you avoid false hope and make smarter moves in the market. #TerraLunaClassic

--

Trump just took the “Trade War” to a whole new level—“104% tariffs on China” are now live. Stocks are tanking, iPhones might cost hundreds more, and your daily essentials could soon spike in price. But what’s really going on—and “who’s paying the price?” Let’s break it down. In 2025, Trump revived his tariff strategy to protect the U.S. economy, target China’s trade practices, and combat fentanyl trafficking. It started with a 10% tariff on Chinese goods, quickly doubled, and expanded to all imports. By April 9, some Chinese products faced up to 104% tariffs—the most aggressive move since the 1930s. The idea is to make Chinese goods more expensive so American-made products look better in comparison. But here’s the problem: most of what people buy—phones, clothes, furniture, electronics—comes from China. So when prices on those jump, it’s you, the consumer, who pays. Economists say this could cost the average American household up to $3,800 more every year just from price increases alone. Meanwhile, big U.S. companies like Apple and Nike, which rely on Chinese manufacturing, are getting crushed. Apple’s stock dropped nearly 20% in three days, wiping out over $600 billion in value. On the flip side, American steel and manufacturing industries might benefit slightly, and the government earns revenue from the tariffs. But for the global economy, the news is grim—markets are sliding, supply chains are breaking, and a worldwide recession is now a serious risk. China isn’t backing down either. It’s already placed 34% tariffs on U.S. goods like soybeans and cars, hitting U.S. farmers and exporters hard. Canada and the EU are also responding with their own tariffs. It’s a tit-for-tat trade war, and nobody seems willing to blink. So while #TRUMP argues this is about American strength, the fallout—higher prices, job risks, and economic uncertainty—is hitting fast. The last time we saw something this big, it helped spark the Great Depression. Let’s hope history doesn’t repeat itself. #TrumpTariffs

--

Is it a fact or just a myth that Bitcoin pumps when China’s currency drops? The answer: “it’s a bit of both”. While there’s no hard rule, history shows a pattern—“when the RMB weakens during trade tensions, #BTC often spikes”. But how true is it today? Let’s break it down. When the U.S. hits China with tariffs, one way China fights back is by letting its currency (the RMB) drop. That makes Chinese exports cheaper, helping offset the impact of tariffs. It’s a tactic China used in past trade wars, like in 2015 and 2019, and it’s very possible they’ll do it again now. Whenever the RMB weakens, some Chinese investors try to protect their money by moving it into assets that can hold value—like Bitcoin. BTC is decentralized and borderless, which makes it attractive, especially when people fear their currency will keep losing value. We’ve seen this before. In 2015 and 2019, as the RMB fell, Bitcoin surged. Some analysts believe Chinese capital was quietly flowing into BTC during those times. But today, it’s more complicated. China has strict crypto bans, making it harder to move money into Bitcoin directly. That hasn’t stopped it entirely—people still use stablecoins, VPNs, and offshore platforms. So, is it bullish for BTC if the #RMB drops? Potentially, yes—but it depends on how much capital actually flows in, and how global markets react. The idea isn’t a guaranteed formula, but in times of uncertainty, $BTC often benefits from fear—and that fear may already be building. #TrumpTariffs #CryptoTariffDrop

--

Seneste nyheder

Bitcoin's Private Key Complexity Highlights Its Security

--

Quantum Computing May Challenge Bitcoin's Security, Says Adam Back

--

Brazilian Court Issues Record Sentences in Crypto Ponzi Scheme Case

--

Bitcoin's Early Stage Valuation Discussed by Blockstream Co-Founder

--

IMF Chief Highlights Trade Tensions and Economic Resilience

--

Cookie-præferencer

Vilkår og betingelser for platform

Vilkår og betingelser for platform

Cookie-præferencer