The topic of which coins should or should not be listed on Binance has sparked much discussion recently. It’s important to understand that the cryptocurrency ecosystem operates as a free market. Liquidity and trading volume are interconnected across centralized exchanges (CEX), decentralized exchanges (DEX), and other platforms, forming a collective liquidity pool. Even if Binance opts not to list certain tokens, these projects continue to exist, and their trading activities shift to other areas within the industry. Liquidity, trading volume, and capital flow diversify across sectors, including Meme coins, blockchain-specific tokens, speculative projects, and even traditional financial markets post-ETF approvals. This redistribution reflects the decentralized and dynamic nature of the crypto space.
When examining the role of venture capital (VC) in the market, it’s clear that VCs have significantly influenced token valuations. However, their funding model often involves long-term lock-up periods, typically around seven years (4+3 years), with management fees and dividends factored in. Most VC-backed cryptocurrency projects require at least a year post-Token Generation Event (TGE) before unlocking funds. Yet, even with substantial financial backing, some VCs face insolvency, and LP investments in the crypto space may yield zero returns. For funded projects, having ample resources offers the potential to weather market cycles, but the long-term value of their tokens relies heavily on fundamentals such as governance models and tokenomics. Investors should conduct comprehensive due diligence, focusing on aspects like token utility, release schedules, allocation structures, and initial circulation. This informed approach is key, as there are no universally correct answers.
#CryptoInsights #DeFiRevolution #FreeMarketCrypto