Thử mua một ít con bò cho chuyến tàu nhanh hôm nay $COW | nicky0x в Binance Square

Уведомление

Популярни статии

Маркирано и харесано

Център за създатели

Настройки

--

Thử mua một ít con bò cho chuyến tàu nhanh hôm nay $COW 

Отказ от отговорност: Включва мнения на трети страни. Това не е финансов съвет. Може да включва спонсорирано съдържание. Вижте Правилата и условията.

1.3k

0

Отговори 1

Котировка 1

Разгледайте най-новите крипто новини

⚡️ Бъдете част от най-новите дискусии в криптовалутното пространство

💬 Взаимодействайте с любимите си създатели

👍 Насладете се на съдържание, което ви интересува

Имейл/телефонен номер

Съответен създател

@nicky0x

Разгледайте повече от Създателя на съдържание

Most platforms would ensure that transactions with severe slippage or insufficient liquidity simply do not go through, protecting users from catastrophic losses. Cetus, on the other hand, seems to leave users to fend for themselves. In decentralized finance (DeFi), transparency and user protection should be top priorities. A simple warning message could have prevented my loss. Instead, Cetus failed to meet even the most basic standards of user safety and responsibility. When a user loses their tokens due to the platform's lack of proper risk management, who takes responsibility? Cetus claims to offer reliable trading tools, yet basic protections are missing. Users are expected to enable modes like aggregator mode on their own without clear instructions or warnings. The support team’s response felt dismissive and failed to acknowledge the platform’s serious flaws. A Warning to Other Traders I write this as a cautionary tale to anyone considering trading on Cetus. Be extremely careful, and do not assume the platform will protect you or issue warnings about potential risks. If you are not already familiar with advanced DeFi tools, Cetus may leave you exposed to unnecessary and devastating losses. Final Thoughts Cetus’s failure to implement proper risk warnings and its casual approach to user safety are unacceptable. A responsible platform should prioritize transparency, user education, and safeguards to ensure users do not lose their funds due to preventable issues. I hope this serves as both a wake-up call for Cetus and a warning for other traders. Without significant improvements, this platform risks losing the trust of its users. To the Cetus team: I urge you to address this issue immediately. Implement proper warnings, enable protective features by default, and take responsibility for user safety. Until then, I cannot recommend this platform to anyone. $CETUS just a shit

--

A Frustrating and Costly Experience on the Cetus Trading Platform Recently, I had an incredibly disappointing experience while using the Cetus trading platform, which resulted in the near-total loss of my SUI tokens. What frustrates me the most is not just the loss itself, but the glaring lack of risk warnings and the apparent irresponsibility from the Cetus team. Let me share the details of this unfortunate incident and my thoughts on the platform's serious shortcomings. The Transaction That Cost Me Everything I executed a transaction on Cetus with the expectation of a smooth and transparent process. To my dismay, the amount of tokens I received was significantly lower than the SUI tokens I spent. During the entire process, I did not receive any warnings about potential issues such as low liquidity or high slippage. For reference, here is the Transaction ID: TX ID: 9fWtSMDWQoJj4xKzk91sRFVJToV144zoXPqhrzrLYX2e This left me in shock. How could such a critical risk go unflagged on a platform that claims to cater to traders? No Warnings, No Protection for Users In most other decentralized platforms I’ve used—such as FlowX and Turbo Finance—I always receive clear warnings when executing transactions in conditions of low liquidity or high slippage. These warnings are crucial because they help users avoid significant losses. However, on Cetus, I was met with absolute silence. There was no alert, no risk notification—nothing. I almost lost all my SUI tokens in this transaction, and it seems the platform did nothing to prevent it. When I reached out to the Cetus support team, their response only added to my frustration. I was told that I should "enable aggregator mode" to fetch liquidity from other sources. But this raises serious questions: Why does the platform not issue risk warnings for low liquidity transactions? Why is such a critical feature like aggregator mode not enabled by default or clearly communicated to users? $CETUS just a shit

--

Với $TIA giá này vẫn mua tốt thôi, thậm chí rẻ là khác, mùa bull nếu trả giá quá nhiều sẽ lỡ mất cơ hội, cách đơn giản là DCA, mua ở nhiều mức giá, và lúc bán cũng vậy !

--

LFG !!! $JASMY Mùa này chỉ việc chọn điểm đẹp, mua, và đi chơi. Đơn giản đúng không ae! Năm nay mình vẫn chưa chốt lời con nào, chỉ mua thêm !

--

Có vẻ như trên BS mọi người thích các chủ đề về trade hơn là kiến thức, hoặc có thể nền tảng ưu tiên hơn các chủ đề về trade. Ok fine ! Đây là góc nhìn của mình về $TIA , target trong hình là target thấp nhất của mình cho TIA với vùng giá quanh 30$. Nếu đạt giá này thì market cap của TIA sẽ quanh $15 bil, bằng vốn hoá hiện tại của AVAX, và bằng 1/10 vốn hoá so với Solana. Khả thi cho một dự án L1 tiên phong #modular Mọi người thì sao ?

--

Последни новини

MicroStrategy Launches Sovereign European Cloud With STACKIT

--

BlackRock IBIT Sees Significant Pre-Market Trading Volume

--

BlackRock IBIT Sees $58 Million In Pre-Market Trading Activity

--

South Korea Advances Institutional Crypto Investment Plans

--

Cypherpunk Values Challenge Crypto's Financialization In 2025

--

Вижте повече

Карта на сайта

Предпочитания за бисквитки

Правила и условия на платформата

Карта на сайта

Правила и условия на платформата

Предпочитания за бисквитки