Telegram Mini App Launches: Time to Prioritize User Trust?

The rise of scam projects like $MemeFi and poorly managed ones like Tomarket $Toma has left the community frustrated. Projects changing TGE and listing dates repeatedly—like Tomarket are turning these terms into meaningless buzzwords. Now, it feels like every week is a new "listing season" and people are losing trust and finally leaving this platform.

While @Durov works toward decentralization, Telegram is still a centralized platform capable of enforcing rules. Should it implement stricter guidelines for mini app launches?

Telegram could require projects to present:

- Clear roadmaps with TGE and Listings

- Defined tokenomics

- Real utility

Projects meeting these standards could launch under approval with consequences for breaking rules.

Right now, many mini apps lack lasting value often failing post-TGE as tokens lose value. Some like Memefi, ToMarket are more focused on creating hype than begging $Ton and Star transition for attention instead of building trust. This cycle of weak projects harms the community and the $TON ecosystem.

As someone who supports TON, I’ve slowed down promoting these apps. If projects are ad-driven or just marketing tools they should admit it. Only a few apps offer real value, and it shows in their success.

Telegram should protect its users by enforcing stricter standards. Weak projects with no clear value shouldn't launch, ensuring the platform becomes a place for quality projects that benefit the community.

Your thoughts?

🎤